Prevalence and distribution of adnexal findings suggesting endometriosis in patients with MR diagnosis of adenomyosis

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 79, Issue 940, 2006, Pages 303-307

  Zacharia, T Thomas ^a,b   O'Neill, M J ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMYOSIS; ADNEXA DISEASE; ADULT; BROAD LIGAMENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEROSA; TREATMENT INDICATION; UTERINE TUBE;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ADULT; BROAD LIGAMENT; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FALLOPIAN TUBE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN DISEASES; PELVIC PAIN; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE DISEASES;

EID: 33645771442     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/70121266     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Dumontier I, Roseau G, Vincent B, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in severe pelvic endometriosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000;24:1197-204.
2. Stratton P, Winkel C, Premkumar A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologic examination for the detection of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1078-85.
3. Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2427-33.
4. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2001;76:588-94.
5. Sampson JA. Benign and malignant endometrial implants in the peritoneal cavity, and their relation to certain ovarian tumors. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1924;38:287-311.
6. Ota H, Igarashi S, Sato N, Tanaka H, Tanaka T. Involvement of catalase in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2002;78:804-9.
7. Starzinski-Powitz A, Zeitvogel A, Schreiner A, Baumann R. In search of pathogenic mechanisms in endometriosis: the challenge for molecular cell biology. Curr Mol Med 2001;1:655-64.
8. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996;199:151-8.
9. Manfredi R, Valentini AL. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Rays 1998;23:702-8.
10. Sharpe-Timms KL. Endometrial anomalies in women with endometriosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 2001,943:131-47.
11. Gougoutas CA, Siegelman ES, Hunt J, Outwater EK. Pelvic endometriosis: various manifestations and MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:353-8.
12. Umaria N, Olliff JF. Imaging features of pelvic endometriosis. Br J Radiol 2001;74:556-62.
13. Glastonbury CM. The shading sign. Radiology 2002;224:199-201.
14. Ylanen K, Laatikainen T, Lahteenmaki P, Moo-Young AJ. Subdermal progestin implant (Nestorone) in the treatment of endometriosis: clinical response to various doses. Acta. Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:167-72.
15. Rotondi M, Labriola D, Rotondi M, Ammaturo FP, Amato G, Carella C, et al. Depot leuprorelin acetate versus danazol in the treatment of infertile women with symptomatic endometriosis. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002;23:523-6.
16. McLucas B, Perrella R, Adler L. Embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1028-9.