Blind source separation for the computational analysis of dynamic oncological PET studies

Oncology Reports

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1007-1012

  Thireou, Trias ^a   Pavlopoulos, Sotiris ^a   Kontaxakis, George ^b   Santos, Andres ^b  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Independent component analysis; Positron emission tomography; Standard uptake values

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; HUMAN; KINETICS; NEOPLASM; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SCINTISCANNING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; KINETICS; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 33645770015     PISSN: 1021335X     EISSN: 17912431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3892/or.15.4.1007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Strauss LG and Conti PS: The applications of PET in clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 32: 623-648, 1991.
2. Keyes JW: SUV: Standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 36: 1836-1839, 1995.
3. Huang SC: Anatomy of SUV. Nucl Med Biol 27: 643-646, 2000.
4. Strauss LG, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A and Haberkorn U: Shortened PET data acquisition protocol for the quantification of 18F-FDG kinetics. J Nucl Med 44: 1933-1939, 2003. (Pubitemid 40022139)
5. Stone JV, Porril J, Porter NR and Wilkinson ID: Spatiotemporal independent component analysis of event-related fMRI data using skewed probability density functions. Neuroimage 15: 407-421, 2002. (Pubitemid 34852550)
6. 15O dynamic myocardial PET using independent component analysis. J Nucl Med 42: 938-943, 2001.
7. Naganawa M, Kimura Y, Ishii K, Oda K, Ishiwata K and Matani A: Extraction of a plasma time-activity curve from dynamic brain PET images based on independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52: 201-210, 2005. (Pubitemid 40188668)
8. Hyvärinen A and Oja E: Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 13: 411-430, 2000. (Pubitemid 30447427)
9. Huber P: Projection pursuit. Ann Stat 13: 435-475, 1985.
10. Hyvärinen A: New approximations of differential entropy for independent component analysis and projection pursuit. Adv Neural Info Process Systems 10: 273-279, 1998.
11. Hyvärinen A and Oja E: A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput 9: 1483-1492, 1997. (Pubitemid 127462801)
12. Hyvärinen A: Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 10: 626-634, 1999.
13. Giannakopoulos X, Karhunen J and Oja E: Experimental comparison of neural ICA algorithms. Proc Int Conf Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN 98): 651-656, 1998.
14. Vigário R, Jousmäki V, Hämäläinen M, Hari R, and Oja E: Independent component analysis for identification of artifacts in magnetoencephalographic recordings. Adv Neural Info Process Systems 10: 229-235, 1998.
15. Kiviluoto K and Oja E: Independent component analysis for parallel financial time series. Proc Int Conf Neural Info Process (ICONIP 98) 2: 895-898, 1998.
16. Hyvärinen A: Sparse code shrinkage: denoising of non-gaussian data by maximum likelihood estimation. Neural Comput 11: 1739-1768, 1999.
17. Ristaniemi T and Joutsensalo J: On the performance of blind source separation in CDMA downlink. Proc Int Workshop Independent Component Anal Signal Separation (ICA 99): 437-441, 1999.
18. Bell A and Sejnowski T: An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7: 1129-1159, 1995.
19. Nadal JP and Parga N: Non-linear neurons in the low noise limit: a factorial code maximizes information transfer. Network 5: 565-581, 1994.
20. Williams P: A Marquardt algorithm for choosing the step-size in backpropagation learning with conjugate gradients. Cognitive Science Research Paper CSRP 229. University of Sussex, 1991.
21. Suzuki K, Kiryu T and Nakada T: Fast and precise independent component analysis for high field fMRI time series tailored using prior information on spatiotemporal structure. Human Brain Mapping 15: 54-66, 2002. (Pubitemid 34020613)
22. Hyvärinen A, Särelä J and Vigário R: Spikes and bumps: Artefacts generated by independent component analysis with insufficient sample size. Proc Int Workshop Independent Component Anal Signal Separation (ICA 99): 425-429, 1999.
23. Toorongian SA, Mulholland GK, Jewett DM, Bachelor MA, Kilbourn MR: Routine production of 2-deoxy-2(F-18)fluoro-Dglucose by direct nucleophilic exchange on a quaternary 4-amino-pyridinium resin. Nucl Med Biol 3: 273-279, 1990. (Pubitemid 20110114)
24. Porril J, Stone J, Berwick J, Mayhew J and Coffey P: Analysis of optical imaging data using weak models and ICA. In: Advances in Independent Component Analysis. Girolami M (ed). Springer- Verlag, pp217-233, 2000.
25. McKeown M: Detection of consistently task-related activations in fMRI data with hybrid independent components. Neuroimage 11: 24-35, 2000.
26. Tong L, Liu RW, Soon VC and Huang YF: Indeterminacy and identifiability of blind identification. IEEE Trans Circuits Systems 38: 499-509, 1991.
27. Molgedey L and Schuster HG: Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations. Phys Rev Lett 72: 3634-3636, 1994.
28. Hyvärinen A, Karhunen J and Oja E: ICA by maximization of nongaussianity. In Independent Component Analysis. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp165-202, 2001.
29. Lapela M, Eigtved A, Jyrkkio S, et al: Experience in qualitative and quantitative FDG PET in follow-up of patients with suspected recurrence from head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer 36: 858-867, 2000. (Pubitemid 30214135)
30. Strauss LG: F-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med 23: 1409-1415, 1996.
31. Visvikis D, Cheze-LeRest C, Costa DC, Bomanji J, Gacinovic S and Ell PJ: Influence of OSEM and segmented attenuation correction in the calculation of standardised uptake values for [18F]FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med 28: 1326-1335, 2001.
32. Lucignani G, Paganelli G and Bombardieri E: The use of standardized uptake values for assessing FDG uptake with PET in oncology: a clinical perspective. Nucl Med Commun 25: 651-656, 2004. (Pubitemid 38901681)