Unveiling the transport

Computer Communication Review

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 99-105

  Mogul, Jeffrey ^a   Brakmo, Lawrence ^a   Lowell, David E ^a   Subhraveti, Dinesh ^a   Moore, Justin ^a  

^a HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING; PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATIONS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); OPTIMIZATION; SECURITY OF DATA;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 33645766517     PISSN: 01464833     EISSN: 01464833     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/972374.972392     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. L. Alvisi, T. C. Bressoud, A. El-Khashab, K. Marzullo, and D. Zagorodnov. Wrapping server-side TCP to mask connection failures. In Pmc. INFOCOM, pages 329-337, Anchorage, AK, April 2001.
2. A. C. Arpaci-Dusseau, R. H. Arpaci-Dusseau, N. C. Burnett, T. E. Denehy, T. J. Engle, H. S. Gunawi, J. A. Nugent, and F. I. Popovici. Transforming policies into mechanisms with infokernel. In Proc. SOSP, pages 90-105, Bolton Landing, NY, Oct. 2003.
3. L. S. Brakmo and L. L. Peterson. TCP Vegas: End to end congestion avoidance on a global Internet. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13(8):1465-1480, 1995.
4. N. Cardwell, S. Savage, and T. Anderson. Modeling TCP latency. In Proc. INFOCOM, pages 1742-1751, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000.
5. D. R. Cheriton and K. J. Duda. A caching model of operating system kernel functionality. In Proc. OSDI, pages 179-193, Monterey, CA, Nov. 1994.
6. S. Cheshire. Latency survey results (for "It's the Latency, Stupid"), http://www.stuartcheshire.org/rants/LatencyResults.html, 1996.
7. P. Culley, U. Elzur, R. Recio, S. Bailey, and J. Carrier. Marker PDU aligned framing for TCP specification. Internet-Draft draft-culley-iwarp-mpa-03, IETF, June 2003. This a work in progress.
8. A. Eiriksson. Relative location of MPA markers considered bad for pipelining. Personal comm., June 2003.
9. E. Elnozahy, L. Alvisi, Y.-M. Wang, and D. B. Johnson. A survey of rollback-recovery protocols in message-passing systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(3):375-408, September 2002.
10. S. Keshav. The packet pair flow control protocol. ICSI Tech. Rep. TR-91-028, Intl. Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, May 1991.
11. B. Krishnamurthy and C. E. Wills. Improving Web performance by client characterization driven server adaptation. In Proc. WWW-11, Honolulu, HI, May 2002.
12. D. E. Lowell, S. Chandra, and P. M. Chen. Exploring failure transparency and the limits of generic recovery. In Pmc. OSDI, pages 289-303, San Diego, CA, Oct. 2000.
13. M. Mathis, J. Mahdavi, S. Floyd, and A. Romanow. TCP selective acknowledgment options. RFC 2018, IETF, October 1996.
14. D. Milojicic, F. Douglis, Y. Paindaveine, R. Wheeler, and S. Zhou. Process migration. ACM Computing Surveys, 32(3):241-299, 2000.
15. J. Mogul and L. Brakmo. Method for dynamically adjusting multimedia content of a Web page by a server in accordance to network path characteristics between client and server. US Patent 6,243,761, June 2001.
16. S. Osman, D. Subhraveti, G. Su, and J. Nieh. The design and implementation of Zap: A system for migrating computing environments. In Proc. OSDI, pages 361-376, Boston, MA, December 2002.
17. P. Patel, A. Whitaker, D. Wetherall, J. Lepreau, and T. Stack. Upgrading transport protocols using mobile code. In Pmc. SOSP, pages 1-14, Bolton Landing, NY, Oct. 2003.
18. R. Pike, D. Presotto, S. Dorward, B. Flandrena, K. Thompson, H. Trickey, and P. Winterbottom. Plan 9 from Bell Labs. Computing Systems, 8(3):221-254, Summer 1995.
19. S. Savage, N. Cardwell, D. Wetherall, and T. Anderson. TCP congestion control with a misbehaving receiver. Computer Communication Review, 29(5), 1999.
20. SCTP.org. Stream Control Transmission Protocol. http://www.sctp.org/.
21. A. C. Snoeren, D. G. Anderson, and H. Balakrishnan. Fine-grained failover using connection migration. In Proc. 3rd USENIX Symp, on Internet Technologies and Systems, pages 221-232, San Francisco, CA, 2001.
22. A. C. Snoeren and H. Balakrishnan. An end-to-end approach to host mobility. In Proc. MobiCom, pages 155-166, Boston, MA, Aug. 2000.
23. R. E. Strom and S. Yemini. Optimistic Recovery in Distributed Systems. ACM Trans. on Computer Systems, 3(3):204-226, Aug. 1985.
24. F. Sultan, K. Srinivasan, D. Iyer, and L. Iftode. Migratory TCP: Connection migration for service continuity in the Internet. In Proc. 22nd Intl. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 469-470, Vienna, July 2002.