Integrating prospect theory and Stackelberg games to model strategic dyad behavior of information providers and travelers: Theory and numerical simulations

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1926, 2005, Pages 181-188

  Han, Qi ^a   Dellaert, Benedict G C ^b   Van Raaij, W Fred ^c   Timmermans, Harry J P ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; SCHEDULING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

GUIDANCE INFORMATION; POLICY OBJECTIVE; RELIABLE FORECASTS; SINGLE-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 33645762327     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1926-21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., J. Bottom, and M. S. Ramming. Route Guidance and Information System. Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, Vol. 215, No. 14, 2001, pp. 317-324.
2. Barfield, W., and T. Dingus. Human Factors in Intelligent Transportation Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 1998.
3. Mahmassani, H. S., and R. Jayakrishnan. System Performance and User Response Under Real-Time Information in a Congested Traffic Corridor. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1991, pp. 293-307.
4. Arnott, R., A. De Palma, and R. Lindsey. Does Providing Information to Road Drivers Reduce Congestion? Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 25, No. 5, 1991, pp. 309-318.
5. Adler, J., and V. Blue. Towards the Design of Intelligent Traveler Information Systems. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 6, 1998, pp. 157-172.
6. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 47, 1979, pp. 263-291.
7. Han, Q., B. Dellaert, F. van Raaij, and H. Timmermans. Modeling the Impact of Emerging, Uncertain, Time-Dependent, Aggregate Activity-Travel Patterns on Individual Activity Participation and Timing Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 28-36.
8. Rasmusen, E. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1990.
9. Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1991.
10. Tamer, B., and G. J. Olsder. Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory. Classics in Applied Mathematics 23, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa., 1995.
11. Arthur, W. B. Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 84, 1994, pp. 406-411.
12. Chen, P. S.-T., K. K. Srinivasan, and H. S. Mahmassani. Effect of Information Quality on Compliance Behavior of Commuters Under Real-Time Traffic Information. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 53-60.
13. Kühne, R. D., K. Langbein-Euchner, M. Hilliges, and N. Koch. Evaluation of Compliance Rates and Travel Time Calculation for Automatic Alternative Route Guidance Systems on Freeways. In Transportation Research Record 1554, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 153-161.
14. Kraan, M., H. S. Mahmassani, and N. Huynh. Traveler Responses to Advanced Traveler Information Systems for Shopping Trips: Interactive Survey Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1725, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 116-123.
15. Srinivasan, K. K., and H. S. Mahmassani. Modeling Inertia and Compliance Mechanisms in Route Choice Behavior Under Real-Time Information. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1725, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 45-53.
16. Bierman, H. S., and L. Fernandez. Game Theory with Economic Applications. Addison Wesley, Boston, Mass., 1998.
17. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. The Psychology of Preferences. Scientific American, Vol. 246, 1982, pp. 160-173.
18. Prelec, D. Compound Invariant Weighting Functions in Prospect Theory. In Choices, Values, and Frames (D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000, pp. 67-92.