Evolutionary behaviour in ecological systems with trade-offs and non-equilibrium population dynamics

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 387-398

  White, A ^a   Greenman, J V ^b   Benton, T G ^c   Boots, M ^d  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive dynamics; Evolutionary branching in fecundity; Population oscillations; Trade offs

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645755801     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Benton. T.G. and Grant, A. 1999. Optimal reproductive effort in stochastic, density-dependent environments. Evolution, 53: 677-688.
2. Boots, M. and Haraguchi, Y. 1999. The evolution of costly resistance in host-parasite systems. Am. Nat., 153: 359-370.
3. Bowers, R.G., White, A., Boots, M., Geritz, S.A.H. and Kisdi, E. 2003. Evolutionary branching/ speciation: contrasting results from systems with explicit or emergent carrying capacities. Evol. Ecol. Res., 5: 883-891.
4. Bowers, R.G., Hoyle, A., White, A. and Boots, M. 2005. The geometric theory of adaptive evolution: trade-off and invasion plots. J. Theor. Biol., 233: 363-377.
5. Bulmer, M.G. 1985. Selection of iteroparity in a variable environment. Am. Nat., 126: 63-71.
6. Cole, L.C. 1954. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Quart. Rev. Biol., 29: 103-137.
7. Cushing, J.M., Costantino, R.F., Dennis, B., Desharnais, R.A. and Henson, S.M. 2003. Chaos in Ecology. London: Academic Press.
8. de Mazancourt, C. and Dieckmann, U. 2004. Trade-off geometries and frequency-dependent selection. Am. Nat., 164: 765-778.
9. Doebeli, M. and Koella, J.C. 1995. Evolution of simple population dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 260: 119-125.
10. Doebeli, M. and Ruxton, G.D. 1997. Evolution of dispersal rates in metapopulation models: branching and cyclic dynamics in phenotype space. Evolution, 51: 1730-1741.
11. Ebenman, B., Johansson, A., Jonsson, T. and Wennergren, U. 1996. Evolution of stable population dynamics through natural selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 263: 1145-1151.
12. Eckmann, J.-P. and Ruelle, D. 1985. Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev. Mod. Phys., 57: 617-656.
13. Ferriere, R. and Gatto, M. 1993. Chaotic population dynamics can result from natural selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 251: 33-38.
14. Gatto, M. 1993. The evolutionary optimality of oscillatory and chaotic dynamics in simple population models. Theor. Pop. Biol., 43: 310-336.
15. Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, E., Meszéna, G. and Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Evolutionary singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol., 12: 35-57.
16. Greenman, J. V., Benton, T.G., Boots, M. and White, A. 2005. The evolution of population dynamics in age-structured populations. Am. Nat., 166: 68-78.
17. Gurney, W.S.C. and Nisbet, R.M. 1998. Ecological Dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Katok, A. and Hasselblatt, B. (1998). Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamics Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kisdi, E. 1999. Evolutionary branching under asymmetric competition. J. Theor. Biol., 197: 149-162.
20. Kisdi, E. 2001. Long-term adaptive diversity in Levene-type models. Evol. Ecol. Res., 3: 721-727.
21. Levins, R. 1962. Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. I. The fitness set and adaptive function. Am. Nat., 96: 361-373.
22. Metz, J.A.J., Nisbet, R.M. and Geritz, S.A.H. 1992. How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? TREE, 7: 198-202.
23. Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs. F.J.A. and Van Heerwaarden, J.S. 1996. Adaptive dynamics: A geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems (S.J. Van Strien and S.M. Verduyn Lunel, eds.), pp. 183-231. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24. Mylius, S.D. and Diekmann, O. 1995. On evolutionary stable life histories, optimisation and the need to be specific about density dependence. Oikos, 74: 218-224.
25. Neubert, M.G. and Caswell, H. 2000. Density-dependent vital rates and their population dynamic consequences. J. Math. Biol., 41: 103-121.
26. Nowak, M. 1990. An evolutionarily stable strategy may be inaccessible. J. Theor. Biol., 142: 237-241.
27. Orzack, S.H. and Tuljapurkar, S. 1989. Population dynamics in variable environments. VII. The demography and evolution of iteroparity. Am. Nat., 133: 901-923.
28. Parvinen, K. 1999. Evolution of migration in a metapopulation. Bull. Math. Biol., 61: 531-550.
29. Ranta, E., Kaitala, V., Alaja, S. and Tesar, D. 2000a. Nonlinear dynamics and the evolution of semelparous and iteroparous reproduction strategies. Am. Nat., 155: 294-300.
30. Ranta, E., Tesar, D., Alaja, S. and Kaitala. V. 2000b. Does evolution of iteroparous and semelparous reproduction call for spatially structured systems? Evolution, 54: 145-150.
31. Ranta, E., Tesar, D. and Kaitala, V. 2002. Environmental variability and semelparity vs. iteroparity as life histories. J. Theor. Biol., 217: 391-396.
32. Roff, D. 2002. Life History Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
33. Rueffler, C., Van Dooren, T.J.M. and Metz, J.A.J. 2004. Adaptive walks on changing landscapes: Levins' approach extended. Theor. Pop. Biol., 65: 165-178.
34. Schaffer, W.M. 1974. Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure. Ecology, 55: 291-303.
35. Sibly, R. and Hone, J. 2002. Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 357: 1153-1170.
36. Stearns, S.C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. White, A. and Bowers, R.G. 2005. Adaptive dynamics of Lotka-Volterra systems with trade-offs: the role of interspecific parameter dependence in branching. Math. Biosci., 193: 101-117.