Framing euthanasia

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 225-228

  Bishop, Jeffrey P ^a  

^a ROYAL CORNWALL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTED SUICIDE; CAUSE OF DEATH; DECISION MAKING; DYING; EUTHANASIA; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LAW; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; METAPHYSICS; PATIENT CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUALITY OF LIFE;

ATTITUDE TO DEATH; DECISION MAKING; EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY; EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE; HUMANS; INTENTION; RIGHT TO DIE; SUICIDE, ASSISTED; TERMINAL CARE; UNITED STATES; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 33645752560     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013847     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Minow M. Which question? Which Lie? Reflections on the physician assisted suicide cases. Supreme Court Review 1997:1-30.
2. Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution: Section 1. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/html/amdt14.html (accessed 30 Jul 2005).
3. Washington v Gluckberg, 117 S Ct 2258 (1997).
4. Vacoo v Quill, 117 S Ct 2293 (1997).
5. Burt R. Death is that man taking names: Intersections of American medicine, law, and culture. San Francisco: University of California Press, 2002.
6. Smith Dame J. The Shipman inquiry: Report 1: section 10. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs /27_01_05ℋipman_firstreport.pdf (accessed 30 Jul 2005).