The face of 21st century physical science librarianship

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 71-90

  Ortega, Lina ^a   Brown, Cecelia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Education of science librarians; Science librarianship

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SURVEYS;

PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY; SCIENCE LIBRARIANSHIP;

LIBRARIES;

EID: 33645749376     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J122v26n02_04     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Booth, Andrew. 2002. From EBM to EBL: Two steps forward or one step back? Medical Reference Services Quarterly 21 (3):51-64.
2. Brown, Cecelia M. and Lina Ortega. Forthcoming 2005. Information seeking behavior of physical science librarians: Does research inform practice? College & Research Libraries.
3. Brown, Lorene B. 1988. Recruiting science librarians. In Librarians for the new millennium, ed. William E. Moen and Kathleen M. Heim, 65-71. Chicago: American Library Association.
4. Dewey, Barbara I. 1986. Science background required-others need not apply: A study of the science librarian hiring crisis. Proceedings of the 49th ASIS Annual Meeting 23:64-68.
5. Eldredge, Jonathan D. 2000. Evidence-based librarianship: An overview. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88 (4):289-301.
6. Fisher, William and James M. Matarazzo. 1993. Professional development for special librarians: Formal education and continuing education for excellence. Library Trends 42 (2):290-303.
7. Frank, Donald G. 1989. Education for librarians in a major science-engineering library: Expectations and Reality. Journal of Library Administration 11 (3/4): 107-116.
8. Frank, Donald G. and Christine Kollen. 1989. Humanities and social science librarians in the science-engineering library: Utilization and implications for effective collection development and reference services. Science & Technology Libraries 9 (Spring 1989):63-71.
9. Gibbs, Beth Liebman. 1993. Subject specialization in the scientific special library. Special Libraries 84 (1):1-8.
10. Gordon, Rachel Singer and Sarah Nesbeitt. 1999. Who we are, where we're going: A report from the front. Library Journal 124 (May 15, 1999): 36-39.
11. Goulding, Anne and Graham Matthews. 2002. Putting research into practice. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 34 (2):63-66.
12. Hackenberg, Jill M. 2000. Who chooses sci-tech librarianship? College & Research Libraries 61 (5):441-450.
13. Hackenberg, Jill M. and Barbara Chu. 2002. Why does one choose sci-tech librarianship? Findings of a survey. Science & Technology Libraries 23 (1):3-16.
14. Hallmark, Julie. 1998. Education for the successful geoscience information specialist. Science & Technology Libraries 17 (2):81-91.
15. Hallmark, Julie and Mary Frances Lembo. 2003. Leaving science for LIS: Interviews and a survey of librarians with scientific and technical degrees. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Spring 2003, http://www.istl.org/03-spring/refereed1.html.
16. Haselbauer, Kathleen. 1984. The making of a science librarian. Science & Technology Libraries 3/4: 111-116.
17. Hooper-Lane, Christopher. 1999. Spotlight on the subject knowledge of chemistry librarians: Results of a survey. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Summer 1999, http://www.istl.org/99-summer/ article.1html.
18. Jones, Mary Lou Baker, Mary Frances Lembo, James E. Manasco, and John H. Sandy. 2002. Recruiting entry-level sci-tech librarians: An analysis of job advertisements and outcome of searches. Sci-Tech News May 2002:12-16.
19. Joswick, Kathleen E. 1999. Article publication patterns of academic librarians: An Illinois case study. College & Research Libraries 60 (4):340-349.
20. Koufogiannakis, Denise and Ellen Crumley. 2002. Evidence-based librarianship. Feliciter, no. 3:112-114.
21. Krupp, Robert G. 1984. What education is best? Science & Technology Libraries 4 (3/4):105-109.
22. Lenzini, Rebecca T. and Carolyn Lipscomb. 2002. The graying of the library profession: A survey of our professional association and their responses. Searcher 10 (7):88-97.
23. Liu, Meng Xiong and Wei Wei. 1993. Science/technology librarians in California: Their background, performance and expectations. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Special Libraries Association, Cincinnati.
24. Lucker, Jay K. 1998. The changing nature of scientific and technical librarianship: A Personal perspective over 40 years. Science & Technology Libraries 17 (2):3-10.
25. Matarazzo, James M. and Joseph J. Mika. 2004. Workforce planning for library and information science. Library & Information Science Research. 26 (2):115-120.
26. Morris-Knower, James. 2001. Phyllostachys Aurea-Didn't he work with Socrates? Reference work in science libraries by librarians who are not scientists. The Reference Librarian 34 (72):155-169.
27. Mount, Ellis. 1985. University science and engineering libraries. 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
28. Osorio, Nestor L. 1999. An analysis of science-engineering academic library positions in the last three decades. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship Fall 1999, http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/ 99-fall/article2.html.
29. Powell, Ronald R., Lynda M. Baker and Joseph J. Mika. 2002. Library and information science practitioners and research. Library & Information Science Research 24: 49-72.
30. Sandy, John H., Mary Frances Lembo, and James E. Manasco. 1998. Preparation for sci-tech librarianship: Results of a survey. Sci-Tech News February 1998: 16-17.
31. Slutsky, Bruce. 1991. How to avoid science anxiety among science librarians. Science & Technology Libraries 12 (1): 11-19.
32. Storm, Paula and Wei Wei. 1994. Issues related to the education and recruitment of science/technology librarians. Science & Technology Libraries 14 (3):35-42.
33. Stuart, Crit and Miriam A. Drake. 1992. Education and recruitment of science and engineering librarians. In Sci-tech libraries of the future, ed. Cynthia A. Steinke, 77-87. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.
34. Turner, Kathlyn J. 2002. The use of applied library and information studies (LIS) research in New Zealand libraries. Library Review 51 (5):230-240.
35. Vazakas, Susan M. and Camille Clark Wallin. 1992. Where are all the science librarians? College & Research Libraries News (March 1992):166-171.
36. Weller, Ann C., Julie M. Hurd, and Stephen E. Wiberley. 1999. Publication patterns of U.S. academic librarians from 1993 to 1997. College & Research Libraries 60 (4):352-362.
37. Wiggins, Gary and Cynthia Monnier. 1994. Assessment of a library science program specializing in chemical information. Special Libraries, Summer 1994:130-138.
38. Wilder, Stanley. 2003. Demographic Change in Academic Librarianship. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
39. Winston, Mark D. 2001. Academic science and engineering librarians: A research study of demographics, educational backgrounds, and professional activities. Science & Technology Libraries 19 (2):3-24.