Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 339-347

  Li, Ru ^a   Saleh, Michael ^a   Yang, Lang ^a   Coulton, Les ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone distraction; Classification; Osteogenesis; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE REGENERATION; CALLUS; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; EXTERNAL FIXATOR; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURE NONUNION; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; LEG LENGTHENING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHORT STATURE; CLASSIFICATION; FEMUR; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TIBIA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BONY CALLUS; FEMUR; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIBIA;

EID: 33645747179     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20026     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aronson J. 1991. The biology of distraction osteogenesis. London: Williams & Wilkins; p 42-52.
2. Paley D. 1988. Current techniques of limb lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop 8:73-92.
3. Saleh M. 1989. Limb lengthening for short stature. Growth Matters 1:2-5.
4. Saleh M. 1992. Technique selection in leg lengthening: the Sheffield practice. Semin Orthop 7:137-151.
5. Catagni M. 1991. The radiographic classification of bone regenerate during distraction. London: Williams & Wilkins; p 53-57.
6. Donnan LT, Saleh M, Rigby AS, et al. 2002. Radiographic assessment of bone formation in tibia during distraction osteogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop 22:645-651.
7. Hamanishi C, Yasuwaki Y, Kikuchi H, et al. 1992. Classification of the callus in limb lengthening. Radiographic study of 35 limbs. Acta Orthop Scand 63:430-433.
8. Minty I, Maffulli N, Hughes TH, et al. 1994. Radiographic features of limb lengthening in children. Acta Radiol 35:555-559.
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174.
10. Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA. 1993. Methods of assessing new bone formation during limb lengthening. Ultrasonography, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and radiography compared. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75:358-364.
11. Kojimoto H, Yasui N, Goto T, et al. 1988. Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. The role of periosteum and endosteum. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:543-549.
12. Young JW, Kovelman H, Resnik CS, et al. 1990. Radiologic assessment of bones after Ilizarov procedures. Radiology 177:89-93.
13. Ilizarov GA. 1989. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 238:249-281.
14. Ilizarov GA. 1989. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 239:263-285.
15. Ilizarov GA. 1990. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 250:8-26.
16. Vade A, Eissenstat R. 1990. Radiographic features of bone lengthening procedures. Radiology 174: 531-537.
17. Kenwright J, White SH. 1993. A historical review of limb lengthening and bone transport. Injury 24(Suppl 2):S9-S19.
18. Fischgrund J, Paley D, Suter C. 1994. Variables affecting time to bone healing during limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 301:31-37.
19. Maffulli N, Lombari C, Matarazzo L, et al. 1996. A review of 240 patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis for congenital post-traumatic or post-infective lower limb length discrepancy. J Am Coll Surg 182:394-402.