Community coalition project directors: What makes them effective leaders?

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 201-209

  Alexander, Mary Perry ^a   Zakocs, Ronda C ^b   Earp, Jo Anne L ^c   French, Elizabeth ^b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalitions; Leadership; Workforce development

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHARACTER; COMMUNITY; ETHNOGRAPHY; LEADERSHIP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; ADDICTION; ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; COMMUNITY CARE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645741990     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200603000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Lasker RD, Weiss ES, Miller R. Partnership synergy: a practical frame for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179-205.
2. Shortell SM, Zukoski AP, Alexander JA, et al. Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002;27(1):49-91.
3. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402.
4. Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):315-330.
5. Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Educ Q. 1996;23:65-79.
6. Kreuter M, Lezin N, Young L. Evaluating community based collaborative mechanisms: implications for practitioners. Health Promot Pract. 200;1(1):49-63.
7. Merzel C, D'Affilinni J. Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):557-574.
8. Florin P, Mitchell R, Stevenson J. Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):417-432.
9. Mattessich PW, Murray-Close M, Monsey BR. Collaboration: What Makes It Work. 2nd ed. St. Paul, Minn: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation; 2001.
10. Kegler MC, Steckler A, Malek SH, McLeroy K. A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Educ Res. 1998;13(2):225-238.
11. Kegler MC, Steckler A, McLeroy K, Malek SH. Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: a study of 10 Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(3):338-353.
12. Weiss ES, Anderson RM, Lasker RD. Making the most of collaboration: exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and functioning. Health Educ Behav. 2002;29(6):683-698.
13. Rogers T, Howard-Bitney B, Feighery EC, Altman DG, Endres JM, Roeseler AG. Characteristics and participant perceptions of tobacco control coalitions in California. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):345-357.
14. Chrislip D, Larson CE. Collaborative Leadership: How Citizens and Civic Leaders Can Make a Difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1994.
15. Kumfer KL, Turner C, Hopkins R, Librett J. Leadership and team effectiveness in community coalitions for the prevention of alcohol and other drug abuse. Health Educ Res. 1993:8(3);359-374.
16. Jellinek PS, Hearn RP. Fighting drug abuse at the local level: can communities consolidate their resources into a single system of prevention, treatment, and aftercare? Issues in Sci Technol. 1991;7(4):78-84.
17. Saxe L, Reber E, Hallfors D, et al. Think globally, act locally: assessing the impact of community-based substance abuse prevention. Eval Program Plann. 1997;20(3):357-366.
18. Miles M, Huberman A. An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
19. Bernard HR. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousands Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2000.