The generation and resemblance heuristics in face recognition: Cooperation and competition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 259-276

  Kleider, Heather M ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Face recognition; Generation; Heuristics; Recognition memory; Resemblance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33645741246     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.259     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255-272.
2. Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 735-741.
3. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233-258.
4. Dysart, J. E., Lindsay, R. C. L., Hammond, R., & Dupuis, P. (2001). Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1280-1284.
5. Ehlers, A., Margraf, J., Davies, S., & Roth, W. (1988). Selective processing of threat cues in subjects with panic attacks. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 201-219.
6. Ekman, P., & Matsumoto, D. (1993). Japanese and Caucasian Neutral Faces (JACNeuF) [Photographs on CD-ROM], For more information, see, as retrieved February 6, 2006, http://www.paulekman.com/researchcds.php
7. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
8. Foa, E., Feske, U., Murdock, T., Kozak, M., & McCarthy, P. (1991). Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 156-162.
9. Geiselman, R. E., Haghighi, D., & Stown, R. (1996). Unconscious transference and characteristics of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime, and. Law, 2, 197-209.
10. Geiselman, R. E., MacArthur, A., & Meerovitch, S. (1993). Transference of perpetrator roles in eyewitness identifications from photo arrays. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 11, 5-15.
11. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Gilbert, D. T. (2002). Inferential correction. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 167-184). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Goldinger, S. D., Kleider, H. M., & Shelley, E. (1999). The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices. Memory & Cognition, 27, 328-338.
14. Gotlib, I., & Cane, D. (1987). Construct accessibility and clinical depression: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 199-204.
15. Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 259-278.
16. Homa, D., Smith, C., Macak, C., Johovich, J., & Osorio, D. (2001). Recognition of facial prototypes: The importance of categorical structure and degree of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 443-474.
17. Houts, M. (1956). From evidence to guilt, Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
18. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
19. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
20. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dwyan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. Roediger III & F. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391-422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
22. Jacoby, L. L., & Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 300-324.
23. Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. M. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
24. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
25. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1996). Conscious and unconscious forms of memory. In R. Bjork & B. L. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Memory (Vol. 10, pp. 31-63). New York: Academic Press.
27. Kelley, D. E. (Writer), Moreno, A. H. (Writer), & Brown, A. (Director). (2000, November 19). Brothers' keepers [Television scries episode]. In D. E. Kelley (Producer), The practice. New York: ABC.
28. Kleider, H. M., & Goldinger, S. D. (2001). Stereotyping ricochet: Complex effects of racial distinctiveness on identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 605-627.
29. Kleider, H. M., & Goldinger, S. D. (2004). Illusions of face memory: Clarity breeds familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 196-211.
30. Leboe, J. P., & Whittlesea, B. W. (2002). The inferential basis of familiarity and recall: Evidence for a common underlying process. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 804-829.
31. Lindsay, D. S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and development (pp. 27-55). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 197-211.
33. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
34. Loftus, E. (1976). Unconscious transference in eyewitness identification. Law and Psychology Review, 2, 93-98.
35. Logan, G. D., & Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned during automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1022-1050.
36. Lorayne, H., & Lucas, J. (1996). The memory book. New York: Ballantine Books.
37. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
38. Mandler, G. (1991). Your face looks familiar but I can't remember your name: A review of dual process theory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowski (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays in human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdoch (pp. 207-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. McNally, R., Riemann, B., & Kim, E. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 28, 407-412.
40. Neisser, U. (1967). Cogmtive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
41. O'Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition, 22, 208-224.
42. Read, J. D., Tollestrup, P., Hammersley, R., McFadzen, E., & Christensen, A. (1990). The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidenlified? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 3-31.
43. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott. K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 803-814.
44. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 123-137.
45. Ross, D. F., Ceci, S. J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M. P. (1994). Unconscious transference and mistaken identity: When a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person. Journal of Applied. Psychology, 79, 918-930.
46. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
47. Smalley, S. (2004, July 20). Police update evidence gathering. Boston Globe, pp. B1, B8.
48. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and. Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.
49. Thompson, D. M. (1988). Context and false recognition. In G. Davies & D. Thompson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 285-345). New York: Wiley.
50. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
51. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
52. Wells, G., Malpass, R., Lindsay, R., Fisher, R., Turtle, J., & Fulero, S. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581-598.
53. Wells. G., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R., Fulero, S., & Brimacombe, C. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.
54. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997). Production, evaluation and preservation of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. Medin (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 221-264). New York: Academic Press.
55. Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716-732.
56. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84-106.
57. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. (2001a). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 3-13.
58. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. (2001b). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 14-33.
59. Witherspoon, D., & Allan, L. G. (1985). The effect of prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task. Memory & Cognition, 13, 101-111.
60. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby. L. L. (1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 131-141.
61. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.
62. Zeitlin, S., & McNally, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit memory bias for threat in post-traumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research Therapy, 29, 451-457.