Confidence intervals in the determination of turbulence parameters

Experiments in Fluids

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 514-522

  Garcia, Carlos M ^a   Jackson, P Ryan ^a   Garcia, Marcelo H ^a  

^a United States of America   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; CORRELATION METHODS; HEAT CONVECTION; HEAT LOSSES; KINETIC ENERGY; TURBULENT FLOW; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

CONVECTIVE VELOCITIES; MOVING BLOCK BOOTSTRAP TECHNIQUE (MBBT); TURBULENCE PARAMETERS; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY;

TURBULENCE;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; CORRELATION METHODS; HEAT CONVECTION; HEAT LOSSES; KINETIC ENERGY; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

EID: 33645740189     PISSN: 07234864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-005-0091-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bendat J, Piersol A (2000) Random data, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
2. Benedict L, Gould R (1996) Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics. Exp Fluids 22:129-136
3. Bera A, Jarque C (1981) Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence regression residuals - Montecarlo evidence. Eco Lett 7:313-318
4. Carlstein E (1986) The use of subseries values for estimating the variance of a general statistic from a stationary sequence. Ann Stat 14:1171-1179
5. Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1-26
6. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York
7. Garcia C, Cantero M, Jackson P, Garcia M (2004) Characterization of the flow turbulence using water velocity signals recorded by Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters. Civil engineering studies, Hydraulic engineering series 75. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
8. Garcia C, Cantero M, Niño Y, García M (2005) Turbulence measurements using acoustic Doppler velocimeter. J Hydraulic Eng 131 (in press)
9. Gould R, Benedict L, Raffoul C, Nejad A (1997). Statistical uncertainties of turbulent kinetic energy balances. ASME fluids engineering division summer meeting FEDSM'97. Vancouver, Canada
10. Hall P, Horowitz J, Jing B (1995) On blocking rules for the bootstrap with dependent data. Biometrika 82:561-574
11. Heskestad G (1965) A generalized Taylor hypothesis with application for high Reynolds number turbulent shear flows. J Appl Mech 32:735-739
12. Kresta S, Wood P (1993) The flow field produced by a pitched blade turbine. Characterization of the turbulence and estimation of the dissipation rate. Chem Eng Sci 48:1761-1774
13. Kunsch H (1989) The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Stat 17:1217-1241
14. Lilliefors H (1967) On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc 62:399-402
15. Moffat R (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1:3-17
16. Odell G, Kovasnay L (1971) A new type of water channel with density stratification. J Fluid Mech 50:535-543
17. Politis D, White H (2004) Automatic block-length selection for the dependant bootstrap. Econ Rev 23:53-70
18. Pope S (2000) Turbulent flows. United Kingdom, Cambridge
19. Wernersson E, Trägardh C (2000) Measurements and analysis of high-intensity turbulent characteristics in a turbine-agitated tank. Exp Fluids 28:532-545