메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 38-49

Dangerous doctrine

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 33645739884     PISSN: 00963402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2968/061002012     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (9)

References (7)
  • 1
    • 55449117389 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • May 20
    • Statement by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein on low-yield nuclear weapons, Congressional Record-Senate, May 20, 2003, S6664.
    • (2003) Congressional Record-Senate
  • 2
    • 84889125335 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jay Davis (former director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency), personal communication. The authors are indebted to him for several important technical commentaries
    • Jay Davis (former director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency), personal communication. The authors are indebted to him for several important technical commentaries.
  • 3
    • 84889120456 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A 5-kiloton explosion at a depth of 5 meters would, within 24 hours, produce a radiation dose that would kill 50 percent of the people over an area of about 15 square kilometers. Significant health hazards (including death for some part of the population) would exist over a much larger area
    • A 5-kiloton explosion at a depth of 5 meters would, within 24 hours, produce a radiation dose that would kill 50 percent of the people over an area of about 15 square kilometers. Significant health hazards (including death for some part of the population) would exist over a much larger area.
  • 4
    • 55449088155 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Nuclear Jitters
    • June 30
    • Keith B. Payne, "The Nuclear Jitters," National Review, June 30, 2003, pp. 22-25.
    • (2003) National Review , pp. 22-25
    • Payne, K.B.1
  • 5
    • 84889126060 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • One might also wonder why deterrence has not yet failed, since these states have had WMD for some time
    • One might also wonder why deterrence has not yet failed, since these states have had WMD for some time.
  • 6
    • 84948819658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Joint Report to Congress, Washington, D.C.: Energy Department, Defense Department, State Department, March
    • The Bush administration agrees that the overwhelming U.S. conventional capability and its demonstrated willingness to use this power encourages proliferation among "rogue" states, but argues that these rogue states acquire weapons not to deter U.S. aggression, but only in order to commit aggression themselves (and to deter the United States from protecting itself or its allies). An Assessment of the Impact of Repeal of the Prohibition on Low-Yield Warhead Development on the Ability of the United States to Achieve Its Nonproliferation Objectives, Joint Report to Congress, (Washington, D.C.: Energy Department, Defense Department, State Department, March 2004), p. 4. This argument might be taken more seriously if the administration did not couple its military power with a strategy of preventive war, a strategy recently demonstrated in Iraq.
    • (2004) An Assessment of the Impact of Repeal of the Prohibition on Low-Yield Warhead Development on the Ability of the United States to Achieve Its Nonproliferation Objectives , pp. 4
  • 7
    • 84889156142 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Terrorists could also acquire such materials from individuals or factions in friendly or reasonably friendly states
    • Terrorists could also acquire such materials from individuals or factions in friendly or reasonably friendly states.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.