The processing of free and bound gender-marked morphemes in speech production: Evidence from Dutch

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 437-442

  Lemhöfer, Kristin ^a,b,c   Schriefers, Herbert ^a,c   Jescheniak, Jörg D ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bound morphemes; Free morphemes; Grammatical gender; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33645739393     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.437     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
2. Costa, A., Kovacic, D., Fedorenko, E., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The gender oongruenoy effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: Evidence from Croatian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1270-1282.
3. Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The selection of closed-class words in noun phrase production: The case of Dutch determiners. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 635-652.
4. La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209-219.
5. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 907-922.
6. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 169-194.
7. Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841-850.
8. Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2002). Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 941-950.
9. Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2005). Selection of gender-marked morphemes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 159-168.
10. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1368-1377.
11. Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H. J. (2005). Dominance affects determiner selection in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 103-119.