Design hyetograph analysis with 3-copula function

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 223-238

  Grimaldi, Salvatore ^a,b   Serinaldi, Francesco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Copula function; Design hyetograph; Intensity duration frequency; Multivariate analysis; Rainfall pattern

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

COPULA FUNCTION; DESIGN HYETOGRAPH; INTENSITY-DURATION-FREQUENCY (IDF) CURVES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RAINFALL PATTERN;

RAIN;

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRECIPITATION ASSESSMENT; PRECIPITATION INTENSITY; RAINFALL;

EID: 33645732940     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.51.2.223     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bacchi, B., Becciu, G. & Kottegoda N. T. (1994) Bivariate exponential model applied to intensities and durations of extreme rainfall. J. Hydrol. 155, 225-236.
2. Barbe, P., Genest, C., Ghoudi, K. & Rémillard, B. (1996) On Kendall's process. J. Multivariate Analysis 58, 197-229.
3. Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. (1964) An analysis of transformation (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 26, 211-246.
4. Bouyé, E., Durrleman, V., Nikeghbali, A., Riboulet, G. & Roncalli T. (2000) Copulas for finance - a reading guide and some applications. In: 17th Int. Conf. Finance (French Finance Association, Paris, France, 27 June 2000, and at First World Congress of the Bachelier Finance Society, 29 June 2000).
5. Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R. & Mays, L. W. (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
6. Correia, F. N. (1987) Multivariate partial duration series in flood risk analysis. In: Hydrologic Frequency Modelling (ed. by V. P. Singh), 541-554. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7. De Michele, C. & Salvadori, G. (2003) A generalized Pareto intensity-duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2-copulas. J. Geophys. Res. 108(D2), 4067, doi:10.1029/2002JD002534.
8. Embrechts, P., McNeil, A. J. & Straumann, D. (1999) Correlation: pitfalls and alternatives. Risk Magazine 12(5), 69-71.
9. Embrechts, P., McNeil, A. J. & Straumann, D. (2002) Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. In: Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond (ed. by M. A. H. Dempster), 176-223. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Embrechts, P., Lindskog, F. & McNeil, A. J. (2003) Modelling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management. In: Handbook of Heavy Tailed Distributions in Finance (ed. by S. T. Rachev), 329-384. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
11. Favre, A.-C., El Adlouni, S., Perreault, L., Thiémonge, N. & Bobée B. (2004) Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resour. Res. 40(1), 1-12, W01101, doi:10.1029/ 2003WR002456.
12. Frees, E. W. & Valdez, E. A. (1998) Understanding relationships using copulas. North Am. Actuarial J. 2(1), 1-25.
13. Genest, C. & MacKay, J. (1986) The joy of copulas: bivariate distributions with uniform marginals. Am. Statistician 40(4), 280-283.
14. Genest, C. & Rivest, L. (1993) Statistical inference procedures for bivariate Archimedean copulas. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 88, 1034-1043.
15. Genest, C., Ghoudi, K. & Rivest, L.-P. (1995) A semiparametric estimation procedure of dependence parameters in multivariate families of distributions. Biometrika 82(3), 543-552.
16. Goel, N. K., Seth, S. M. & Chandra, S. (1998) Multivariate modeling of flood flows. J. Hydraul. Engng 124(2), 146-155.
17. Gumbel, E. J. (1958) Statistics of Extremes. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
18. Gumbel, E. J. (1960a) Distributions des valeurs extrèmes en plusieurs dimensions. Publications de L'Institute de Statistique 9, 171-173.
19. Gumbel, E. J. (1960b) Bivariate exponential distributions. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 55, 698-707.
20. Gumbel, E. J. & Mustafi, C. K. (1967) Some analytical properties of bivariate extreme distributions. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 62, 569-588.
21. Hashino, M. (1985) Formulation of the joint return period of two hydrologic variates associated with a Poisson process. J. Hydrosci. Hydraul. Engng 3(2), 73-84.
22. Joe, H. (1997) Multivariate Models and Dependence Concept. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA.
23. Keifer, C. J. & Chu, H. H. (1957) Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 83(1332), 1-25.
24. Kimberling, C. A. (1974) Probabilistic interpretation of complete monotonicity. Aequationes Mathematicœ 10, 152-164.
25. Koutsoyiannis, D. & Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (1993) A scaling model of a storm hyetograph. Water Resour. Res. 29(7), 2345-2361.
26. Lee, A. J. (1993) Generating random binary deviates having fixed marginal distributions and specified degrees of association. Am. Statistician 47(3), 209-215.
27. Nelsen, R. B. (1999) An Introduction to Copulas. Lecture Notes in Statistics 139, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
28. Olivera, F. & Stolpa, D. (2003) Effect of the storm hyetograph duration and shape on the watershed response. In: Proc. 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB). Washington DC, USA.
29. Pilgrim, D. H. & Cordery, I. (1975) Rainfall temporal patterns for design floods. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 101, 81-95.
30. Sackl, B. & Bergmann, H. (1987) A bivariate flood model and its application. In: Hydrologic Frequency Modelling (ed. by V. P. Singh), 571-582. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
31. Salvadori, G. & De Michele, C. (2004) Analytical calculation of storm volume statistics involving Pareto-like intensity-duration marginals. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L04502, doi:10.1029/2003GL018767.
32. Singh, K. & Singh, V. P. (1991) Derivation of bivariate probability density functions with exponential marginals. J. Stochast. Hydrol. Hydraul. 5, 55-68.
33. Sklar, A. (1959) Fonction de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de L'Institute de Statistique, Université de Paris 8, 229-231.
34. Tiago de Oliveira, J. (1975) Bivariate extremes: extensions. Bull. Int. Statist. Inst. 46(2), 241-251.
35. Thompson, D. B. (2002) Storm hyetographs for Texas. Literature Review for TxDOT Project 0-4194, 1-25. Texas Tech. University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
36. Veneziano, D. & Villani, P. (1999) Best linear unbiased design hyetograph. Water Resour. Res. 35(9), 2725-2738.
37. Yue, S., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Bobée, B., Legendre, P. & Bruneau, P. (1999) The Gumbel mixed model for flood frequency analysis. J. Hydrol. 226(1/2), 88-100.
38. Yue, S. (2000a) Joint probability distribution of annual maximum storm picks and amounts as represented by daily rainfalls. Hydrol. Sci. J. 45(2), 315-326.
39. Yue, S. (2000b) The Gumbel mixed model applied to storm frequency analysis. Water Resour. Manage. 14, 377-389.
40. Yue, S. (2001) The Gumbel logistic model for representing a multivariate storm event. Adv. Water Resour. 24, 79-185.
41. Zarris, D., Koutsoyiannis, D. & Karavokiros, G. (1998) A simple stochastic rainfall disaggregation scheme for urban drainage modelling. In: Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. on Developments in Urban Drainage Modelling (ed. by D. Butler & C. Maksimovic), 85-92. IAWQ/UNESCO/Imperial College, London.