Eddy-current induction in extended metallic parts as a source of considerable torsional moment

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 585-590

  Graf, Hansjörg ^a   Lauer, Ulrike A ^a   Schick, Fritz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Eddy current; Implant; Instrument; MR safety; Torque

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; COPPER; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONDUCTANCE; EDDY CURRENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GRADIENT SWITCHING; GRAVITY; METAL IMPLANTATION; MOTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TORSION; VELOCITY; VIBRATION;

ALUMINUM; COPPER; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METALS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 33645698268     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20539     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Specific standard of the "American Society for Testing and Materials" ASTM F 2213-02: measurement of magnetically induced torque on passive implants in the magnetic resonance environment.
2. Schenck JF. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:2-19.
3. Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ. Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: compatibility and safety aspects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:26-38.
4. Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ. Cochlear implants: in vitro investigation of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging-compatibility arid safety aspects. Radiology 1998;208:700-708.
5. Shellock FG. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:295-299.
6. Shellock FG. Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: evaluation of MR safety. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:152-157.
7. Edwards MB, Taylor KM, Shellock FG. Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:363-369.
8. Schueler BA, Parrish TB, Lin JC, et al. MRI compatibility and visibility assessment of implantable medical devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:596-603.
9. Shellock FG. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:721-732.
10. Shellock FG, Hatfleld M, Simon BJ, et al. Implantable spinal fusion stimulator: assessment of MR safety and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:214-223.
11. Sullivan PK, Smith JF, Rozzelle AA. Cranio-orbital reconstruction: safety and image quality of metallic implants on CT and MRI scanning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94:589-596.
12. Shafiei F, Honda E, Takahashi H, Sasaki T. Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. J Dent Res 2003;82:602-606.
13. Robertson NM, Diaz-Gomez M, Condon B. Estimation of torque on mechanical heart valves due to magnetic resonance imaging including an estimation of the significance of the Lenz effect using a computational model. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:3793-3807.
14. Wheeler HA. Formulas for the skin effect. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of IRE, 1942. p 412-424.
15. Grover W. Inductance calculations: working formulas and tables. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.; 1946.
16. Hartwell RC, Shellock FG. MRI of cervical fixation devices: sensation of heating caused by vibration of metallic components. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:771-772.