Mountain plover population responses to black-tailed prairie dogs in Montana

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1546-1553

  Dinsmore, Stephen J ^a,c   White, Gary C ^a   Knopf, Fritz L ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Charadrius montanus; Cynomys ludovicianus; Montana; Mountain plover; Population trend; Prairie dog; Status

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; POPULATION MODELING; RECRUITMENT; RODENT; WADER;

MONTANA; NORTH AMERICA; PHILLIPS COUNTY [MONTANA]; UNITED STATES;

CANIS FAMILIARIS; CHARADRIUS MONTANUS; CICONIIFORMES; CYNOMYS; CYNOMYS LUDOVICIANUS;

EID: 33645692608     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1546:MPPRTB]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. AKAIKE, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267-281 in B. N. Petran and F. Csaki, editors. International symposium on information theory. Second edition. Budapest, Hungary.
2. BARNES, A. M. 1993. A review of plague and its relevance to prairie dog populations and the black-footed ferret. Pages 28-37 in J. L.Oldemeyer, D. E. Biggins, B. J. Miller, and R. Crete, editors. Management of prairie dog complexes for the reintroduction of the black-footed ferret. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 13.
3. BROWN, S., C. HICKEY, B. HARRINGTON, AND R. GILL. 2001. The U.S. shorebird conservation plan. Second edition. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, Massachusetts, USA.
4. BUCKLAND, S. T., K. P. BURNHAM, AND N. H. AUGUSTIN. 1997. Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 53:603-618.
5. BURNHAM, K. P., D. R. ANDERSON, G. C. WHITE, C. BROWNIE, AND K. H. POLLOCK. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. American Fisheries Society Monograph 5.
6. _, AND _. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
7. CASWELL, H. 2001. Matrix population models. Second edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
8. DINSMORE, S. J., G. C. WHITE, AND F. L. KNOPF. 2003. Annual survival and population estimates of mountain plovers in southern Phillips County, Montana. Ecological Applications 13:1013-1026.
9. FRANKLIN, A. B. 2001. Exploring ecological relationships in survival and estimating rates of population change using program MARK. Pages 290-296 in R. Field, R. J. Warren, H. Okarma, and P. R. Sievert, editors. Wildlife, land, and people: priorities for the 21st century. Proceedings of the second international wildlife management congress. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
10. _, D. R. ANDERSON, E. D. FORSMAN, K. P. BURNHAM, AND F. W. WAGNER. 1996. Methods for collecting and analyzing demographic data on the northern spotted owl. Studies in Avian Biology 17:12-20.
11. _, K. P. BURNHAM, G. C. WHITE, R. G. ANTHONY, E. D. FORSMAN, C. SCHWARZ, J. D. NICHOLS, AND J. E. HINES. 1999. Range-wide status and trends in northern spotted owl populations. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
12. KNOPF, F. L. 1994. Avian assemblages on altered grasslands. Studies in Avian Biology 15:247-257.
13. _, AND B. J. MILLER. 1994. Charadrius montanus-montane, grassland, or bare-ground plover? Auk 111:504-506.
14. _, AND J. R. RUPERT. 1996. Reproduction and movements of mountain plovers breeding in Colorado. Wilson Bulletin 108:28-35.
15. KNOWLES, C. J. 1999. A species conservation plan for the black- and white-tailed prairie dogs in Montana. Draft report to the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Helena, USA.
16. _, AND P. R. KNOWLES. 1984. Additional records of mountain plovers using prairie dog towns in Montana. Prairie Naturalist 16:183-186.
17. _, C. J. STONER, AND S. P. GIEB. 1982. Selective use of black-tailed prairie dog towns by mountain plovers. Condor 84:71-74.
18. LEBRETON, J. D., K. P. BURNHAM, J. CLOBERT, AND D. R. ANDERSON. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case histories. Ecological Monographs 62:67-118.
19. LESLIE, P. H. 1945. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 35:183-212.
20. MILLIGAN, J. L., A. K. DAVIS, AND S. M. ALTIZER. 2003. Error associated with using colored leg bands to identify wild birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 74:111-118.
21. OLSON, S. L. 1984. Density and distribution, nest site selection, and activity of the mountain plover on the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, USA.
22. _, AND D. EDGE. 1985. Nest site selection by mountain plovers in northcentral Montana. Journal of Range Management 38:280-282.
23. OLSON-EDGE, S. L., AND W. D. EDGE. 1987. Density and distribution of the mountain plover on the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. Prairie Naturalist 19:233-238.
24. PRADEL, R. 1996. Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52:703-709.
25. SKALSKI, J. R., A. HOFFMAN, AND S. G. SMITH. 1993. Testing the significance of individual- and cohort-level covariates in animal survival studies. Pages 9-28 in J.-D. Lebreton and P. M. North, editors. Marked individuals in the study of bird population. Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
26. VOSBURGH, T. C., AND L. R. IRBY. 1998. Effects of recreational shooting on prairie dog colonies. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:363-372.
27. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. 2002. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: threatened status and special regulation for the mountain plover. Federal Register 67 (234):72396-72407.
28. _. 2003. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: withdrawal of the proposed rule to list the mountain plover as threatened. Federal Register 68(174):53083-53101.
29. WHITE, G. C., AND K. P. BURNHAM. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120-139.