School Internet use, youth and risk: A social-cultural study of the relation between staff views of online dangers and students' ages in UK schools

British Educational Research Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 307-329

  Hope, Andrew ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645687935     PISSN: 01411926     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01411920600569305     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Ball, S. J., Bowe, R. & Gewirtz, S. (1996) School choice, social class and distinction: the realisation of social disadvantage in education, Journal of Educational Policy, 11, 89-113.
2. Bauman, Z. (1991) Modernity and ambivalence (Cambridge, Polity Press).
3. Beck, U. (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity (London, Sage).
4. Bradbury, J. (1989) The policy implications of differing concepts of risk, Science, Technology & Human Values, 14(4), 380-399.
5. Britton, Z. (1998) Safety net (Eugene, Oregon, Harvest House Publishers).
6. Brinkley, I. (1997) Underworked and underpaid, Soundings, 6(1), 161-171.
7. Burchell, G., Gordon, C. & Miller, P. (Eds) (1991) The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality (London, Harvester/Wheatsheaf).
8. Cashmore, E. E. (1984) No future: youth and society (London, Heinemann).
9. Castells, M. (1996) The information age: economy, society and culture. Volume I: The rise of network society (Oxford, Blackwell).
10. Dean, M. (1999) Risk, calculable and incalculable, in: D. Lupton (Ed.) Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 205-228.
11. Department for Education and Employment (1997) Connecting the learning society (London, The Stationery Office).
12. Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and danger (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul).
13. Douglas, M. (1985) Risk acceptability according to the social sciences (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).
14. Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory (London, Routledge).
15. Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
16. European Commission (1996) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Illegal and harmful content on the Internet, Com (96) 487, Final, Brussels, 16 October.
17. Furedi, F. (1997) Culture of fear: risk taking and the morality of low expectation (London, Cassell).
18. Furlong, A. & Cartmel, F. (1997) Young people and social change (Buckingham, Open University Press).
19. Gewirtz, S. (1996) Market discipline versus comprehensive education, in: J. Ahier, B. Cosin & M. Hales (Eds) Diversity and change: education policy and selection (London, Routledge).
20. Giddens, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity (Cambridge, Polity Press).
21. Giddins, A. (1991) Modernity and self-identity (Cambridge, Polity Press).
22. Gomm, R. (2004) Social research methodology (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
23. Graham, G. (1999) The Internet: a philosophical inquiry (London, Routledge).
24. Hammersley, M. (1992) What's wrong with ethnography? (London, Routledge).
25. Hope, A. (2003) Panopticism, play and the resistance of surveillance: case studies in the observation of Internet use in UK schools, paper delivered to the British Sociological Conference 2003, University of York, 11-13 April.
26. Hope, A. (2004) School Internet use and the blurring of boundaries in 'risk society': case studies of the dangers arising from 'net' use in UK schools, paper delivered to the British Sociological Conference 2004, University of York, 22-24 March.
27. Kaprow, M. (1985) Manufacturing danger: fear and pollution in industrial society, American Anthropology, 87, 342-356.
28. Kennedy, M. M. (1979) Generalizing from single case studies, Evaluation Quarterly, 3(4), 661-678.
29. Lawson, T. & Comber, C. (2000) Censorship, the Internet and schools: a new moral panic? The Curriculum Journal, 11(2), 273-285.
30. Lupton, D. (1999) Risk (London, Routledge).
31. May, T. (2001) Social research: issues, methods and processes (Buckingham, Open University Press).
32. Moran-Ellis, J. & Cooper, G. (2000) Making connections: children, technology, and the National Grid for Learning, Sociological Research Online, 5(3). Available online at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/3/moran-ellis.html (accessed 23 September 2004).
33. Muncie, J. (1999) Youth and crime: a critical introduction (London, Sage).
34. Oswell, D. (1998) The place of 'childhood' in Internet content regulation: a case study of policy in the UK, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1, 131-151.
35. Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic evaluation (London, Sage).
36. Plant, M. A. & Plant, M. (1992) Risk-takers: alcohol, drugs, sex and youth (London, Routledge).
37. Roberts, K. (1995) Youth employment in modern Britain (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
38. Rose, N. (1985) The psychological complex (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul).
39. Schofield, J. W. (1993) Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research, in: M. Hammersley (Ed.) Educational research: current issues (vol. 1) (London, Paul Chapman), 91-113.
40. Selwyn, N. (1999) The discursive construction of the National Grid for Learning, Oxford Review of Education, 26(1), 63-79.
41. Szerszynski, B., Lash, S. & Wynne, B. (1996) Introduction: Ecology realism and the social sciences, in: S. Lash, B. Szerszynski & B. Wynne (Eds) Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology (London, Sage), 1-26.
42. Thompson, K. (1998) Moral Panics (London, Routledge).
43. Whine, M. (1997) The Far Right on the Internet, in: B. Loader (Ed.) The Governance of Cyberspace (London, Routledge), 209-227.
44. Wynne, B. (1989) Frameworks of rationality in risk management: towards the testing of naïve sociology, in: J. Brown (Ed.) Environmental threats: perception, analysis and management (London, Bellhaven Press), 33-47.
45. Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay-knowledge divide, in: S. Lash, B. Szerszynski & B. Wynne (Eds) Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology (London, Sage), 44-83.