Levels of analysis and interdependence of data in small groups research: The case of web-based knowledge integration;Analyseebenen und dateninterdependenz in der kleingruppenforschung am beispiel netzbasierter wissensintegration

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 41-50

  Piontkowski, Ursula ^a   Keil, Wolfgang ^a   Hartmann, Juliane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Group effect; Information pooling; Mixed models; Statistical analysis of group data; Unshared information

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645684304     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.41     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bliese, P.D. & Hanges, P.J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 400-417.
2. Bonito, J. A. (2002). The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence. Small Group Research, 33, 412-438.
3. Bonito, J. A. (2004). Shared cognition and participation in small groups: Similarity of member prototypes. Communication Research, 31, 704-730.
4. Diehl, M. & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
5. Dennis, A.R. (1996). Information exchange in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20, 433-458.
6. Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S. & Frey, D. (2003). Präferenzkonsistenz und Geteiltheit von Information als Einflussfaktoren auf Informationsbewertung und intendiertes Diskussionsverhalten bei Gruppenentscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 9-23.
7. Heninger, W.G., Dennis, A. R. & Hilmer, K. M. (2003). Cognitive interference in computer-mediated group decision making. TR142-1, Indiana University, [http://www.indiana.edu/~isdept/research/workingpapers.html].
8. Hollingshead, A.B. & McGrath, J.E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds), Team reflectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Hoyle, R. H., Georgesen, J. C. & Webster, J. M. (2001). Analyzing data from individuals in groups: The past, the present, and the future. Group Dynamics, 5, 41-47.
10. Kashy, D. A. & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H.T. Reis & C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Kenny, D. A. & Judd, C.M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422-431.
12. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A. & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York, US: McGraw-Hill.
13. Kenny, D.A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S. & Kashy, D.A. (2002). Statistical analysis of data from small group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
14. Kozlowski, S.W.J. & Klein, K.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K.J. Klein & S.W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
15. Larson, J.R., Sargis, E.G. Elstein, A.S. & Schwartz, A. (2002). Holding shared versus unshared information: Its impact on perceived member influence in decision-making groups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 145-155.
16. Laus, F.O. (o.J.). Kollabs. [http://www-psy.uni-muenster.de/inst3/AEKeil/ laus/kollabs-doc/interna.html].
17. Leyland, A.H. (2004) A review of multilevel modeling in SPSS. [http://multilevel.ioe.ac.uk/softrev/reviewspss.pdf].
18. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc.
19. Maindonald, J.H. & Braun, W.J. (2003). Data analysis and graphics using R - an example-based approach. Cambridge University Press.
20. Nezlek, J.B. & Zyzniewski, L.E. (1998). Using hierarchical linear modeling to analyze grouped data. Group Dynamics, 2, 313-320.
21. Pinheiro, J. & Bates, D. M. (2000). Linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer.Piontkowski, U., Keil, W., Hartmann, J. & Münzer, S. (2005).
22. Voraussetzungen und Möglichkeiten der Wissensintegration in computer-mediierten Gruppen. In E. Kruse, K. Küchler & M. Kuhl. (Hg.), «Unbegrenztes Lernen - Lernen über Grenzen» (S. 153-165). Münster: Lit.
23. Rashbash, J. (2004). Mixed models in SPSS. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57, 189-190.
24. Snijders, T. (2004, February). Introduction to Multilevel Analysis, ICS Department of Sociology, University of Groningen.
25. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
26. Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
27. Straus, S. G. (1996), Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142.
28. Strijbos, J.W., Martens R.L., Jochems, W.M.G. & Broers N.J. (2001). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195-229.
29. Stroebe, W. & Nijstad, B.A. (2004). Warum Brainstorming in Gruppen Kreativität vermindert: Eine kognitive Theorie der Leistungsverluste beim Brainstorming. Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 2-10.
30. Tesluk, P. E., Zaccaro, S., Marks, M. & Mathieu, J. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In M. Brannick & E. Salas (Eds.), Assessment and measurement of team performance: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 197-226). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
31. Walczuch, R.M. & Watson, R.T. (2001). Analyzing Group Data in MIS Research: Including the Effect of the Group. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 83-94.
32. Wegner, D.M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
33. Witte, E. & Engelhardt, G. (2003). Gruppenentscheidungen bei Hidden Profiles. «Shared view»-effekt oder kollektiver « primacy»-effekt? Empirische Ergebnisse und theoretische Anmerkungen. HAFOS Nr. 47, Psychologisches Institut I der Universität Hamburg.