Study on optimal frequency design problem for multimodal network using probit-based user equilibrium assignment

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1923, 2005, Pages 236-245

  Uchida, Kenetsu ^a   Sumalee, Agachai ^b   Watling, David ^b   Connors, Richard ^b  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RAILROAD STATIONS; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; STOCHASTIC CONTROL SYSTEMS;

MULTIMODAL NETWORK; OPTIMAL TRANSIT FREQUENCY; TRANSIT LINES; WAITING TIMES;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 33645679549     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1923-25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Connors, R. D., A. Sumalee, and D. P. Watling. Variable Demand Probit-Based Network Design Problem: Implicit Programming Approach. Proc., 10th World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul, Turkey, 2004 (CD-ROM).
2. Dial, R. B. Transit Pathfinder Algorithm. In Highway Research Record 205, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1967, pp. 67-85.
3. Fearnside, K., and D. P. Draper. Public Transport Assignment - A New Approach. Traffic Engineering Control, 1967, pp. 298-299.
4. Rapp, M. H., P. Mattenberger, S. Piguet, and A. Robert-Grandpierre. Interactive Graphics System for Transit Route Optimization. In Transportation Research Record 559, TKB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 73-88.
5. Chriqui, C., and P. Robillard. Common Bus Lines. Transportation Science, Vol. 9, 1975, pp. 115-121.
6. Spiess, H. On Optimal Route Choice Strategies in Transit Networks. Publication 286. Centre de Recherche sur les Transports, University of Montreal, Canada, 1983.
7. Spiess, H., and M. Florian. Optimal Strategies: A New Assignment Model for Transit Networks. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 23, 1989, pp. 83-102.
8. De Cea, J., and E. Fernandez. Transit Assignment for Congested Public Transport System: An Equilibrium Model. Transportation Science, Vol. 27, 1993, pp. 133-147.
9. Wu, J. H., M. Florian, and P. Marcotte. Transit Equilibrium Assignment: A Model and Solution Algorithms. Transportation Science, Vol. 28, 1994, pp. 193-203.
10. Lam, W. H. K., Z. Y. Gao, K. S. Chan, and H. Yang. A Stochastic User Equilibrium Assignment Model for Congested Transit Networks. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 33, 1999, pp. 351-368.
11. Nielsen, O. A. A Stochastic Transit Assignment Model Considering Differences in Passenger Utility Functions. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 34, 2000, pp. 377-402.
12. Fernandez, E., J. De Cea, M. Florian, and E. Cabrera. Network Equilibrium Models with Combined Modes. Transportation Science, Vol. 28, 1994, pp. 182-192.
13. Lo, H. K., C. W. Yip, and K. H. Wan. Modeling Transfer and Non-linear Fare Structure in Multi-modal Network. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 37, 2003, pp. 149-170.
14. Gao, Z. Y., H. Sun, and L. L. Shan. A Continuous Equilibrium Network Design Model and Algorithm for Transit Systems. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 235-250.
15. Wardrop, J. G. Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Part II, 1952, pp. 325-378.
16. Daganzo, C. F., and Y. Sheffi. On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment. Transportation Science, Vol. 11, 1977, pp. 253-274.
17. Clark, S. D., and D. P. Watling. Sensitivity Analysis of the Probit-Based Stochastic User Equilibrium Assignment Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 617-635.
18. Bell, M., and Y. Iida. Transportation Network Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1997.
19. Daganzo, C. Multinomial Probit: The Theory and Its Application to Demand Forecasting. Academic Press, New York, 1979.