|
Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 419-422
|
A further critical evaluation of requests for electrodiagnostic examinations
|
Author keywords
Electrodiagnosis; Electrodiagnostic services; Electromyography; Nerve conduction study; Referrals
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME;
CHILD;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
ELECTRODIAGNOSIS;
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY;
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;
FEMALE;
FUNCTION TEST;
GENERAL PRACTITIONER;
HUMAN;
HYPOTHESIS;
ITALY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
NERVE CONDUCTION;
NEUROLOGIC DISEASE;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
POLYNEUROPATHY;
PROVOCATION TEST;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
CHILD;
ELECTRIC STIMULATION;
ELECTRODIAGNOSIS;
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEURAL CONDUCTION;
PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES;
REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;
|
EID: 33645674431
PISSN: 15901874
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-006-0525-y Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (33)
|
References (7)
|