A process-oriented interactive design environment for automatic user-interface adaptation

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 79-116

  Antona, Margherita ^a   Savidis, Anthony ^a   Stephanidis, Constantine ^a,b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^c INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVAILABILITY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LIFE CYCLE;

AUTOMATED GENERATION; AUTOMATED VERIFICATION; INTEGRATED SUPPORTS; INTERACTIVE DESIGN; INTERFACE ADAPTATION; INTERFACE SPECIFICATION; PROGRESSIVE ACCUMULATION; SMOOTH TRANSITIONS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 33645674146     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc2002_2     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Antona, M., Savidis, A., & Stephanidis, C. (2005). A support tool for the design of user interface adaptation. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal access in HCI: Exploring new interaction environments. Volume 7 of the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International 2005), Las Vegas, NV, July 22-27. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Ball, L., Lambell, N., Ormerod, T., Slavin, S., & Mariani, S. J. (2001). Representing design rationale to support innovative design reuse: A minimalist approach. Journal of Automation in Construction, 10, 663-674.
3. Bellotti, V. (1993). Integrating theoreticians' and practitioners' perspectives with design rationale. Proceedings of INTERCHI'93, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 101-114.
4. Biere, M., Bomsdorf, B., & Szwillus, G. (1999). The visual task model builder. Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces II, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI'99, 245-256.
5. Bodart, F., Hennebert, A.-M., Leheureux, J.-M., Provot, I., & Vanderdonckt, J. (1994). A model-based approach to presentation: A continuum from task analysis to prototype. Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, 25-39.
6. Browne, T., Davila, D., Rugaber, S., & Stirewalt, K. (1997). Using declarative descriptions to model user interfaces with MASTERMIND. In F. Paternò & P. Palanque (Eds.), Formal methods in human-computer interaction (pp. 93-121). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Buckingham Shum, S. (1996). Design argumentation as design rationale. In A. Kent & G. Williams (Eds.), The encyclopedia of computer science and technology (pp. 95-128). New York: Marcel Dekker.
8. Burge, J., & Brown, D. C. (2000). Inferencing over design rationale. In J. Gero (Ed.), Artificial intelligence in design '00 (pp. 611-629). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
9. Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., & Thevenin, D. (2001). A unifying reference framework for the development of plastic user interfaces. Proceedings of the 2001 Engineering of Human - Computer Interaction Conference (EHCI'2001), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 173-192.
10. Conklin, J., & Burgess-Yakemovic, K. (1995). A process-oriented approach to design rationale. In T. Moran & J. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale concepts, techniques, and use (pp. 293-428). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Dey A. K., & Abowd, G. D. (2000). Towards a better understanding of context and context awareness. Proceedings of the Workshop on the What, Who, Where, When and How of Context-Awareness, affiliated with the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. Retrieved January 9, 2006 from ftp://ftp.cc.gatech.edu.pub.gvu/tr/1999/99-22.pdf
12. Eisenstein, J., & Puerta, A. (2000). Adaptation in automated user-interface design. Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces 2000, 74-81. Retrieved January 9, 2006 from http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/jacobe/papers/iui00. pdf
13. Eisenstein, J., Vanderdonckt, J., & Puerta, A. (2001). Applying model-based techniques to the development of UIs for mobile computers. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces IUI'2001, 69-76.
14. Fischer, G., Lemke, A., McCall, R., & Morch, A. (1995). Making argumentation serve design. In T. Moran & J. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale concepts, techniques, and use (pp. 267-294). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Foley, J., Kim, W., Kovacevic, S., & Murray, K. (1991). UIDE - An intelligent user interface design environment. In W. Mark & J. W. Sullivan (Eds.), Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 339-384). New York: Addison-Wesley.
16. Griffiths, T., Barclay, P. J., McKirdy, J., Paton, N. W., Gray, P. D., Kennedy, J., et al. (1999). Teallach: A model-based user interface development environment for object databases. Proceedings of User Interfaces to Data Intensive Systems (UIDIS), 86-96.
17. Hoare, C. A. R. (1978). Communicating sequential processes. Communications of the ACM, 21, 666-677.
18. ISTAG Advisory Group. (2001). ISTAG Advisory Group Report on "Scenarios for Ambient Intelligence in 2010." Retrieved January 9, 2006 from ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/ist/docs/istagscenarios2010.pdf
19. Karsenty, L. (1996). An empirical evaluation of design rationale documents. CHI 96 Electronic Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.acm.org/ sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/Karsenty/lk_txt.htm
20. Lee, J. (1997). Design rationale systems: Understanding the issues. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 12, 78-85.
21. Lewis, R. J. (1995). IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 57-78.
22. Lu, S., Paris, C., & Vander Linden, K (2002). Tamot: Towards a flexible task modeling tool. Proceedings of Human Factors 2002 [Electronic version].
23. Luo, P., Szekely, P., & Neches, R. (1993). Management of interface design in humanoid. Proceedings of INTERCHI'93, 107-114.
24. MacLean, A., Young, R., Bellotti, V., & Moran, T. (1991). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 201-250.
25. Markopoulos, P., Wilson, S., Pycock, J., & Johnson, P. (1992). Adept - A task-based design environment. 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2, 587-596.
26. Mori, G., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2002). CITE: Support for developing and analysing task models for interactive system design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28, 797-813.
27. Paris, C., Vander Linden, K., & Lu, S. (2001). Automatic generation of on-line help: A system based on practical issues. Proceedings of the 2001 Australasian Natural Language Processing Workshop, 61-68.
28. Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2002). One model, many interfaces. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces, 143-154.
29. Pinheiro da Silva, P. (2000). User interface declarative models and development environments: A survey. In P. Palanque & F. Paternò (Eds.), Interactive systems: Design, specification, and verification (pp. 207-226). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Puerta, A. R. (1996). The Mecano Project: Comprehensive and integrated support for model-based interface development. In J. Vanderdonckt (Ed.), Computer-aided design of user interfaces (pp. 19-25). Namur, Belgium: Presses Universitaires de Namur.
31. Puerta, A. R. (1999). Principles of design for task-based user interface tools. CHI'99 Workshop on Tool Support for Task-Based User Interface Design [Electronic version]. Available from http://www.upb.de/fachbereich/AG/szwillus/ chi99/ws/PosPap/puerta.html
32. Puerta, A., & Eisenstein, J. (1998). Interactively mapping task models to interfaces in MOBI-D. In F. Paterno (Ed.), Design, specification and verification of interactive systems (pp. 261-273) Abingdon, UK: Springer-Verlag.
33. Puerta, A., & Eisenstein, J. (1999). Towards a general computational framework for model-based interface development systems. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces IUI'99, 171-178.
34. Savidis, A., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2005a). Applying the Unified User Interface Design Method in health telematics. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal access in health telematics: A design code of practice. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3041, pp. 115-140). New York: Springer-Verlag.
35. Savidis, A., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2005b). A decision-making specification language for verifiable user-interface adaptation logic. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 15(6), 1-32.
36. Savids, A., & Stephanidis, C. (2001). Designing with varying design parameters: The Unified Design process. In Proceedings of the Workshop No. 14, "Universal design: Towards universal access in the info society," organized in the context of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2001), Seattle, WA, March 31-April 5. Retrieved from http://www.ics.forth.gr/hci/files/ch12001/savidis.pdf
37. Savidis, A., & Stephanidis, C. (2004a). Unified User Interface Design: Designing universally accessible interactions. International Journal of Interacting with Computers, 16, 243-270.
38. Savidis, A., & Stephanidis, C. (2004b). Unified User Interface development: Software engineering of universally accessible interactions. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3, 165-193.
39. Seffah, A., & Javahery, H. (2003). Multiple user interfaces: Engineering and application framework. New York: Wiley.
40. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Pushing human-computer interaction research to empower every citizen. Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 85-91.
41. Stary, C. (2000). TADEUS, seamless development of task-based and user-oriented interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 30, 509-525.
42. Stephanidis, C. (2001a). The concept of Unified User Interfaces. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), User interfaces for all - Concepts, methods, and tools (pp. 371-388). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
43. Stephanidis, C. (2001b). User interfaces for all: New perspectives into human-computer interaction. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), User interfaces for all - Concepts, methods, and tools (pp. 3-17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Sukaviriya, P., Foley, J. D., & Griffith, T. (1993). A second generation user interface design environment: The model and the runtime architecture. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 375-382.
45. Szekely, P. (1996). Retrospective and challenges for model based interface development. Proceedings of the 3rd International Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS'96, 1-27.
46. Szekely, P., Luo, P., & Neches, R. (1992). Facilitating the exploration of interface design alternatives: The HUMANOID Model of Interface Design. Proceedings of the CHI'92, 507-514.
47. Szekely, P., Sukaviriya, P., Castells, P., Muthukumarasamy, J., & Salcher, E. (1995). Declarative interface models for user interface construction tools: The Mastermind approach. Proceedings of the Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction (EHCI'95), 120-150.
48. van Welie, M., van der Veer, G. C., & Eliëns, A. (1998). Euterpe - Tool support for analyzing cooperative environments. Ninth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 25-30.
49. Wilson, S., Johnson, P., Kelly, C., Cunningham, J., & Markopoulos, P. (1993). Beyond hacking: A model based approach to user interface design. Proceedings of HCI'93, 217-231.
50. Winograd, T. (2001). From programming environments to environments for designing. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), User interfaces for all - Concepts, methods, and tools (pp. 165-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
51. Winograd, T., Bennett, J., De Young, L., & Hartfield, B. (Eds.). Bringing design to software. New York: Addison-Wesley.