Comparing women’s prisons: Epistemological and methodological issues

Contrasts in Criminal Justice: Getting from Here to There

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 117-136

  Bertrand, Marie Andree ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645669564     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315193779     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Berger, Peter and Luckmann, Thomas (1967), The Social Construction of Reality, Garden City, NY.: Doubleday Inc.
2. Bertrand, Marie-Andrée with Biron, Louise L., Di Pisa, Concetta, Fagnan, Andrée B. and McLean, Julia (1998), Prisons pour femmes, Montreal: Les Editions du Méridien.
3. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1992), Jail Inmates, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
4. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1993a), Sourcebook on Criminal Justice Statistics 1992 and 1993, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
5. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1993b), Prisoners 1993, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
6. Centre Canadien de la Statistique Juridique (1993), Services correctionnels pour adultes au Canada, 1993, Ottawa, Ontario: Statistique Canada.
7. Christie, Nils (1981), Limits to Pain, Oxford: Martin Robinson.
8. Christie, Nils (1993), Crime Control as Industry, London: Routledge.
9. Cohen, Stanley and Taylor, Laurie (1972), Psychological Survival. The Experience of Long-Term Imprisonment, New York: Pantheon Books.
10. Council of Europe (1994-95), Bulletin d’information pénologique, (18, 19, 20), December.
11. Delphy, Christine (1970), ‘L’ennemi principal’, Partisans, 54-55, 157-72.
12. Delphy, Christine (1975), ‘Pour un féminisme matérialiste’, L’Arc, 61, 61-68.
13. Foucault, Michel (1975), Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
14. Goffman, Erving (1968), Asiles, étude sur la condition sociale des malades mentaux, Paris: Minuit.
15. Guillaumin, Colette (1978), ‘Pratique de pouvoir et idéé de nature (1) 1’appropriation des femmes’, Questions féministes, 2, 5-50.
16. Harding, Sandra (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Hulsman, Louk (1987), The Criminal Justice System as a Social Problem: An Abolitionist Perspective. Part One, Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press.
18. Hulsman, Louk with Bernat de Celis. Jacqueline (1982), Peines Perdues: Le Système Pénal en Question, Paris: Editions le Centurion.
19. Juteau, Danielle and Laurin, Nicole (1988), ‘L’évolution des formes d’appropriation des femmes’, Revue canadierne de sociologie et d’anthropologie, 25 (2), 188-207.
20. Lofland, John (1971), Analysing Social Settings. A Guide to Qualitative Observations and Analysis, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21. MacKinnon, Catherine, A. (1989), Towards a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Mathiesen, Thomas (1974), The Politics of Abolition, New York: Halsted.
23. Mathiesen, Thomas (1990), Prisons on Trial, London: Routledge.
24. Poupart, Jean (1993), ‘Discours et débats autour de la scientificité des entretiens de recherche’, Sociologie et sociétés, 25 (2), 93-110.
25. Schatzman, Leonard and Strauss, Anselm L. (1973), Field Research: Strategies for Natural Sociology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Schütz, Alfred (1954), ‘Concepts in Theory Formation’, The Journal of Philosophy, 51 (9), 257-73.
27. Schütz, Alfred (1962, 1964, 1966), Collected Papers, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
28. Schütz, Alfred (1982), Life Forms and Meaning Structure, London: Routledge.
29. Schütz, Alfred and Luckmann, Thomas (1973), The Structure of the Lifeworld. Evanston, 111: Northwestern University Press.
30. Strauss, Anselm (1987), Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.