Robust 1D inversion and analysis of helicopter electromagnetic (HEM) data

Geophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2006, Pages

  Tølbøll, Rasmus Juhl ^a   Christensen, Neils Bøie ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Geomagnetism; Geophysical techniques; Groundwater; Hydrology; Terrestrial electricity

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRICITY; CORRELATION METHODS; GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HELICOPTER-BORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC (HEM) SYSTEM; QUANTITATIVE MODEL PARAMETER ANALYSES; TERRESTRIAL ELECTRICITY;

GEOMAGNETISM;

AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY; DATA PROCESSING; ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY;

EID: 33645669473     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2187752     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Auken, E., and A. V. Christiansen, 2004, Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data: Geophysics, 69, 752-761. GPYSA7 0016-8033
2. Auken, E., N. Foged, and K. I. Sørensen, 2002, Model recognition by 1-D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data: 8th Meeting, Environmental and Enginering Geophysics (EEGS-ES), Proceedings, 241-244.
3. Beamish, D., 2002a, An assessment of inversion methods for AEM data applied to environmental studies: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 51, 75-96.
4. Beamish D. 2002b, The canopy effect in airborne EM: Geophysics, 67, 1720-1728.
5. Beard, L. P., 2000, Comparison of methods for estimating earth resistivity from airborne electromagnetic measurements: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 45, 239-259.
6. Christensen, N. B., and E. Auken, 1992, Simultaneous electromagnetic layered model analysis: GeoSkrifter, 41, 49-56.
7. Christensen, N. B., and K. I. Sørensen, 1998, Surface and borehole electric and electromagnetic methods for hydrogeophysical investigations: European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 3, 75-90.
8. Christensen, N. B., and K. I. Sørensen, 2001, Pulled array continuous electrical sounding with an additional inductive source: An experimental design study: Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 241-254.
9. Christiansen, A. V., and N. B. Christensen, 2003, A quantitative appraisal of airborne and ground-based transient electromagnetic (TEM) measurements in Denmark: Geophysics, 68, 523-534. GPYSA7 0016-8033
10. Danielsen, J. E., E. Auken, F. Jørgensen, V. Søndergaard, and K. I. Sørensen, 2003, The application of the transient electromagnetic method in hydrogeophysical surveys: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 53, 181-198.
11. Farquharson, C. G., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1998, Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure: Geophysical Journal International, 134, 213-227. GJINEA 0956-540X
12. Fitterman, D. V., 1998, Sources of calibration errors in helicopter EM data: International Conference on Airborne Electromagnetics, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Proceedings 1.8.1-1.8.10.
13. Fraser, D. C., 1978, Resistivity mapping with an airborne multicoil electromagnetic system: Geophysics, 43, 144-172.
14. Fraser, D. C., 1987, Electromagnetic anomaly recognition within geologic and cultural noise, in T. G. Hildenbrand, G. L. Raines, and D. V. Fitterman, eds., National airborne geophysics programme: Developments and applications of modern electromagnetic surveys: U. S. Geologic Survey Bulletin, 1925, 53-64.
15. Gyulai, A., and T. Ormos, 1999, A new procedure for the interpretation of VES data: 1.5-D simultaneous inversion method: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 41, 1-17.
16. Hodges, G., 2003, Practical inversions for helicopter electromagnetic data: 15th Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP), Proceedings, 45-58.
17. Huang, H., and D. C. Fraser, 1996, The differential parameter method for multifrequency airborne resistivity mapping: Geophysics, 61, 100-109. GPYSA7 0016-8033
18. Inman, J. R., 1975, Resistivity inversion with ridge regression: Geophysics, 40, 798-817. GPYSA7 0016-8033
19. Jakobsen, T., E. Andersen, A. Nøddelund, A. Sonnenborg, A. Andesen, and T. Bjerre, 1997, Grundvandet i Storstrøms Amt (The groundwater in Storstrøms Amt): Storstrøms Amt Technical Report.
20. Menke, W., 1989, Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inversion theory: Academic Press Inc.
21. Poulsen, L. H., and N. B. Christensen, 1999, Hydrogeophysical mapping with the transient electromagnetic sounding method: European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 3, 201-220.
22. Sengpiel, K.-P., 1988, Approximate inversion of airborne EM data from a multilayered ground: Geophysical Prospecting, 36, 446-459. GPPRAR 0016-8025
23. Sengpiel, K.-P., and B. Siemon, 1998, Examples of 1-D inversion of multifrequency HEM data from 3-D resistivity distributions: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 133-141.
24. Sengpiel, K.-P., and B. Siemon 2000, Advanced inversion methods for airborne electromagnetic exploration: Geophysics, 65, 1983-1992.
25. Siemon, B., 2001, Improved and new resistivity-depth profiles for helicopter electromagnetic data: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 46, 65-76.
26. Siemon, B., C. Stuntebeck, K.-P. Sengpiel, B. Röttger, H.-J. Rehli, and D. G. Eberle, 2002, Investigation of hazardous waste sites and their environment using the BGR helicopter-borne geophysical system: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 7, 169-181. JOEEDU 0733-9372
27. Sørensen, K. I., 1996, Pulled array continuous electrical profiling: First Break, 14, 85-90.
28. Sørensen, K. I., and E. Auken, 2004, Sky TEM - A new high-resolution helicopter transient electomagnetic system: Exploration Geophysics, 35, 191-199. EXGEEF 0812-3985