fMRI studies of sensitivity and habituation effects within the auditory cortex at 1.5 T and 3 T

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 454-458

  Rabe, Kerstin ^a   Michael, Nikolaus ^a   Kugel, Harald ^a   Heindel, Walter ^a   Pfleiderer, Bettina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; BOLD; Field strength; fMRI; Habituation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BLOOD OXYGENATION LEVEL DEPENDENT MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; FIELD STRENGTH; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGIC NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL DECAY; SIGNAL DETECTION; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 33645661488     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20547     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Schwindt W, Kugel H, Bachmann R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2170-2179.
2. Thulborn KR, Chang SY, Shen GX, Voyvodic JT. High resolution echo-planar-fMRI of human visual cortex at 3.0 tesla. NMR Biomed 1997;10:183-190.
3. Ogawa S, Lee T, Nayak AS, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance imaging of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:68-78.
4. Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:5675-5679.
5. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 2001;412:150-157.
6. Pfleiderer B, Ostermann J, Michael N, Heindel W. Visualization of auditory habituation by fMRI. Neuroimage 2002;17:1706-1710.
7. Michael N, Ostermann J, Sōrōs P, Schwindt W, Pfleiderer B. A subgroup of depressed patients presented altered habituation in the auditory cortex as measured by fMRI. Neuropsychobiology 2004;49:5-9.
8. Laurian S, Gaillard JM, Grasset F, Oros L, Schöpf J. Short-term habituation of auditory evoked responses in schizophrenics. Res Commun Psychol Psychiatry Behav 1988;13:35-42.
9. Bernal B, Altmann NR. Auditory functional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1009-1015.
10. Eden GF, Joseph JE, Brown HE, Brown CP, Zeffiro TA. Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: the behavior interleaved gradients technique. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:13-20.
11. Talvage TM, Edminster WB, Ledden PJ, Weisskoff RM. Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise. Hum Brain Mapp 1997;7:79-88.
12. Jâncke L, Shah N, Posse S, Grosse-Ruyken M, Müller- Gärtner HW. Intensity encoding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 1998;36:875-883.
13. Bilecen D, Scheffler K, Schmid N, Tschopp K, Seelig J. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI. Hearing Res 1998;126:19-27.
14. Fera F, Yongbi MN, van Gelderen P, Frank JA, Mattay VS, Duyn JD. EPI-BOLD fMRI of human motor cortex at 1.5T and 3T: sensitivity dependence on echo time and acquisition bandwidth. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:19-26.
15. Shah NJ, Steinhoff S, Mirzazade S, et al. The effect of sequence repeat time on auditory cortex stimulation during phonetic stimulation. Neuroimage 2000:100-108.
16. Hiller W, Zaudig M, Mombour W. International diagnostic checklist (IDCL) for DSM-IV [in German]. Göttingen/Bern/Toronto: Hogrefe Verlag; 2000.
17. 2* measurements to establish optimum echo time for fMRI: studies of the visual, motor, and auditory cortex at 3.0T. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:930-933.
18. Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Hoge R, Evans AC, Pike B. Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. Neuroimage 1999;10:417-429.
19. Strupp JP. Stimulate: a GUI based fMRI analysis software package. Neuroimage 1996;3:S607.
20. D'Esposito M, Zarahn E, Aguirre GK, Rypma B. The effect of normal aging on the coupling of neural activity to the BOLD hemodynamic response. Neuroimage 1999;10:6-14.
21. Huettel SA, Singermann JD, McCarthy G. The effect of aging upon the hemodynamic response measured by functional MRI. Neuroimage 2001;13:161-175.
22. Yang Y, Engelien W, Xu S, Stern E. A silent event-related functional MRI technique for brain activation studies without interference of scanner acoustic noise. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:185-190.
23. Hashimoto RH, Homae F, Nakajima K, Miyashita Y, Sakai KL. Functional differentiation in the human auditory and language area revealed by a dichotic listening task. Neuroimage 2000;12:147-158.
24. Moffat SD, Hampson E, Lee DH. Morphology of the planum temporale and corpus callosum in left handers with evidence of left and right hemisphere speech representation. Brain 1998;121:2369-2379.
25. Stippich C, Freitag P, Kassubek J, et al. Motor, somatosensory and auditory cortex localization by fMRI and MEG. Neuroreport 1998;9:1953-1957.
26. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hutton C, Josephs O, Deichmann R, Price C, Turner R. Echo time dependence of BOLD contrast and susceptibility artifacts. Neuroimage 2002;15:136-142.