Hyporheic exchange flows induced by constructed riffles and steps in lowland streams in southern Ontario, Canada

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 4287-4305

  Kasahara, Tamao ^a,b   Hill, Alan R ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Groundwater surface water interactions; Hyporheic zone; MODFLOW; Riffles; Stream restoration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROLOGY; SEDIMENTS; SURFACE WATERS;

GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS; HYPORHEIC ZONE; RIFFLES; STREAM RESTORATION;

STREAM FLOW;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROLOGY; SEDIMENTS; STREAM FLOW; SURFACE WATERS;

GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYPORHEIC ZONE; LONGITUDINAL GRADIENT; RIFFLE; STREAM BED; STREAMWATER; SUBSURFACE FLOW;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 33645659049     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6174     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bencala KE, Walters RA. 1983. Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool-and-riffle streams: a transient storage model. Water Resources Research 19: 718-724.
2. Boulton AJ. 2006. Hyporheic rehabilitation in rivers: restoring vertical connectivity. Freshwater Biology in press.
3. Brookes A. 1996. River restoration experience in northern Europe. In River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects, Brookes A, FD Shields (eds). Wiley: 233-267.
4. Brookes A, Shields Jr FD. 1996. Perspectives on river channel restoration. In River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects, Brookes A, Shields FD (eds). Wiley: 1-19.
5. Criss RE, Davisson ML. 1996. Isotopic imaging of surface water/ groundwater interactions, Sacramento Valley, California. Journal of Hydrology 178: 205-222.
6. Dahm CN, Grimm NB, Marmonier P, Valett HM, Vervier P. 1998. Nutrient dynamics at the interface between surface waters and groundwaters. Freshwater Biology 40: 427-451.
7. D'Angelo DJ, Webster JR, Gregory SV, Meyer JL. 1993. Transient storage in Appalachian and Cascade mountain streams as related to hydraulic characteristics. Journal of North American Benthological Society 12: 223-235.
8. Fetter CW. 1994. Applied Hydrogeology. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
9. Findlay S, Strayer D, Goumbala C, Gould K. 1993. Metabolism of stream water dissolved organic carbon in the shallow hyporheic zone. Limnology and Oceanography 38: 1493-1499.
10. Foster G, Ashmore P. 1999. Pools, riffles and channel morphology of erosional streams in southern Ontario. In Proceedings of 2nd International Natural Channel Systems Conference, March, Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada.
11. Fuller CC, Harvey JW. 2000. Reactive uptake of trace materials in the hyporheic zone of a mining-contaminated stream, Pinal Creek, Arizona. Environment Science and Technology 34: 1150-1155.
12. Geist DR, Dauble DD. 1998. Redd site selection and spawning habitat use by fall Chinook salmon: the importance of geomorphic features in large rivers. Environmental Management 22: 655-669.
13. Harper DM, Ebrahimnezhad M, Taylor E, Dickinson S, Decamp O, Verniers G, Balbi T. 1999. A catchment-scale approach to the physical restoration of lowland UK rivers. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 9: 141-157.
14. Harvey JW, Bencala KE. 1993. The effect of streambed topography on surface-subsurface water exchange in mountain catchments. Water Resources Research 29: 89-98.
15. Harvey JW, Wagner RJ. 2000. Quantifying hydrologic interactions between streams and their subsurface hyporheic zones. In Streams and Ground Waters, Jones JA, PJ Mulholland (eds). Academic Press: San Diego, CA.
16. Hill AR, Labadia CF, Sanmugadas K. 1998. Hyporheic zone hydrology and nitrate dynamics in relation to the streambed topography of a N-rich stream. Biogeochemistry 42: 285-310.
17. Jones JB, Mulholland PJ (eds). 2000. Streams and Ground Waters. Academic Press: San Diego, CA.
18. Kasahara T, Wondzell SM. 2003. Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams. Water Resources Research 39: 1005. DOI: 10.1029/2002WR001386.
19. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite difference groundwater flow model. OR-83-875, US Geological Survey.
20. Morrice JA, Valett HM, Dahm CN, Champana ME. 1997. Alluvial characteristics, groundwater-surface water exchange and hydrological retention in headwater streams. Hydrological Processes 11: 253-267.
21. Osborne LL, Bayley PB, Higler LW (eds). 1993. Lowland stream restoration: theory and practice. Freshwater Biology 29: 187-342.
22. Packman AI, MacKay JS. 2003. Interplay of stream-subsurface exchange, clay particle deposition, and streambed evolution. Water Resources Research 39: 1097. DOI: 10.1029/2002WR001432.
23. Pollock DW. 1994. User's guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, version 3: a particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model. Open-File Report 94-464, US Geological Survey.
24. Salehin M, Packman AI, Paradis M. 2004. Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneous sediments: laboratory experiments and modeling. Water Resources Research 40: W11504. DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002567.
25. Schälchli U. 1992. The clogging of coarse gravel river beds by fine sediment. Hydrobiologia 235-236: 189-197.
26. Sear DA. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4: 169-177.
27. Stanford JA, Ward JW. 1993. An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: continuity and the hyporheic corridor. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 48-60.
28. Stanley EH, Jones JB. 2000. Surface-subsurface interactions: past, present, and future. In Streams and Ground Waters, Jones JA, PJ Mulholland (eds). Academic Press: San Diego, CA.
29. Sterba O, Uvira V, Mathur P, Rulik M. 1992. Variation of the hyporheic zone through a riffle in the R. Morava, Czechoslovakia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 7: 31-43.
30. Storey RG, Howard KWF, Williams DD. 2003. Factors controlling riffle-scale hyporheic exchange flows and their seasonal changes in a gaining stream: a three-dimensional groundwater flow model. Water Resources Research 39: 1034. DOI: 10.1029/20021367.
31. Triska FJ, Kennedy VC, Avanzino RJ. 1989. Retention and transport of nutrients in a third-order stream in northwestern California: hyporheic process. Ecology 70: 1893-1905.
32. Valett HM, Morrice JA, Dahm CN, Campana ME. 1996. Parent lithology, surface-groundwater exchange, and nitrate retention in headwater streams. Limnology and Oceanography 41: 333-345.
33. Vervier P, Dobson M, Pinay G. 1993. Role of interaction zones between surface and ground waters in DOC transport and processing: considerations for river restoration. Freshwater Biology 29: 275-284.
34. Vollmer S, Ramos FS, Daebel H, Kühn G. 2002. Micro scale exchange processes between surface and subsurface water. Journal of Hydrology 269: 3-10.
35. White DS. 1993. Perspectives on defining and delineating hyporheic zones. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 61-69.
36. White DS, Elzinga CH, Hendricks SP. 1987. Temperature patterns within the hyporheic zone of a northern Michigan river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 6: 85-91.
37. Williams DD, Hynes HBN. 1974. The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream. Freshwater Biology 4: 233-256.
38. Wondzell SM, Swanson FJ. 1996. Seasonal and storm dynamics of the hyporheic zone of a 4th-order mountain stream I: hydrologic processes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 3-19.
39. Wroblicky GJ, Campana ME, Valett HM, Dahm CN. 1998. Seasonal variation in surface-subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream-aquifer systems. Water Resources Research 34: 317-328.