Nambu-Goldstone mode in a rotating dilute Bose-Einstein condensate

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2006, Pages

  Ueda, Masahito ^a,b   Nakajima, Tatsuya ^c  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMIXED QUADRUPOLAR EXCITATIONS; DIAGONALIZATION CALCULATIONS; HARMONICALLY CONFINED; NAMBU-GOLDSTONE MODE (NGM); QUASIDEGENERATE SPECTRUM; ROTATING DILUTE BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATE; VORTEX NUCLEATION;

ENERGY GAP; FLOW INTERACTIONS; MECHANISMS; NUCLEATION; VORTEX FLOW;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 33645655944     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.043603     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. S. Inouye, M. R. Andrews, J. Stenger, H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/32354 392, 151 (1998).
2. S. L. Cornish, N. R. Claussen, J. L. Roberts, E. A. Cornell, and C. E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1795 85, 1795 (2000).
3. N. K. Wilkin, J. M. F. Gunn, and R. A. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2265 80, 2265 (1998).
4. B. Mottelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83. 2695 83, 2695 (1999).
5. K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, W. Wohlleben, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.806 84, 806 (2000).
6. D. A. Butts and D. S. Rokhsar, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/16865 397, 327 (1999).
7. S. Sinha and Y. Castin, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.190402 87, 190402 (2001).
8. M. Tsubota, K. Kasamatsu, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.023603 65, 023603 (2002).
9. M. Kramer, L. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, and F. Zambelli, Laser Phys. LAPHEJ 1054-660X 12, 113 (2002).
10. G. F. Bertsch and T. Papenbrock, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5412 83, 5412 (1999).
11. T. Nakajima and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.043610 63, 043610 (2001);
12. M. Ueda and T. Nakajima, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.063609 64, 063609 (2001);
13. G. M. Kavoulakis, B. Mottelson, and C. J. Petnick, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.063605 62, 063605 (2000);
14. G. M. Kavoulakis, B. Mottelson, and S. M. Reimann, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.055602 63, 055602 (2001);
15. V. Bardek, L. Jonke, and S. Meljanac, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.015603 64, 015603 (2001);
16. V. Bardek and S. Meljanac, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.013602 65, 013602 (2002).
17. In a previous paper [T. Nakajima and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.140401 91, 140401 (2003)], we reported the results of similar exact diagonalization calculations for N=25. However, this size is too small to reveal the structure of a quasi-degenerate spectrum on the order of g, and thus we could not distinguish the NGM from the yrast line. However, if we restrict L to L □ N, we can perform exact diagonalization calculations for a much larger N, say, N=10 000, though we are then not able to cover L up to L / N∼0.1, which is necessary to investigate how the NGM becomes massive with increasing L.
18. X.-J. Liu, H. Hu, L. Chang, W. Zhang, S.-Q. Li, and Y.-Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.030404 87, 030404 (2001).
19. R. A. Smith and N. K. Wilkin, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.061602 62, 061602 (R) (2000);
20. T. Papenbrock and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.023616 63, 023616 (2001).