Microsimulation of flexible transit system designs in realistic urban networks

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1923, 2005, Pages 153-163

  Cortés, Cristián E ^a   Pagès, Laia ^b   Jayakrishnan, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; GROUND VEHICLES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION; PARATRANSIT SERVICE; SIMULATION DEVELOPERS; TRANSIT SYSTEMS FUNCTION;

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 33645653791     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1923-17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Crainic, T. G., F. Malucelli, and M. Nonato. Flexible Many-to-Few + Few-to-Many = an Almost Personalized Transit System. TRISTAN IV, São Miguel, Azores Islands, 2001, pp. 435-440.
2. Horn, M. E. T. Multi-modal and Demand-Responsive Passenger Transport Systems: A Modeling Framework with Embedded Control Systems. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 36, 2001, pp. 167-188.
3. Horn, M. E. T. Fleet Scheduling and Dispatching for Demand-Responsive Passenger Services. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 10, 2002, pp. 35-63.
4. Aldaihani, M., and M. Dessouky. Hybrid Scheduling Methods for Paratransit Operations. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 45, 2003, pp. 75-96.
5. Cortés, C. E., and R. Jayakrishnan. Design and Operational Concepts of a High Coverage Point-to-Point Transit System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1783, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 178-187.
6. Jayakrishnan, R., C. E. Cortés, R. Lavanya, and L. Pagès. Simulation of Urban Transportation Networks with Multiple Vehicle Classes and Services. Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
7. Choa, F., R. T. Milam, and D. Stanek. CORSSIM, PARAMICS AND VISSIM: What the Manuals Never Told You. Proc., 9th TRB Conference on Planning Methods, Baton Rouge, La., April 6-10, 2003.
8. Bloomberg, L., and J. Dale. Comparison of VISSIM and CORSIM Traffic Simulation Models on a Congested Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1727, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 52-60.
9. Venglar, S. P., D. B. Fambro, and T. Bauer. Validation of Simulation Software for Modeling Light Rail Transit. In Transportation Research Record 1494, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 161-166.
10. Note, I. Integration of a Center-Running Guided Busway into an Arterial Street. Presented at VISSIM User Group Meeting, Seattle, 2001.
11. Multisystems, Inc. Bus Rapid Transit Simulation Model Research and Development. Report. USDOT/SBIR Phase 1, Oct. 2000.
12. Abdulhai, B., A. Shalaby, and A. Georgi. Microsimulation Modeling and Impact Assessment of Streetcar Transit Priority Options: Toronto Experience. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
13. Oh, J.-S., C. E. Cortés, R. Jayakrishnan, and D.-H. Lee. Microscopic Simulation with Large-Network Path Dynamics for Advanced Traffic Management and Information Systems. Proc., 6th International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation Engineering, Singapore, June 2000.
14. Jayakrishnan, R., H. Mahmassani, and T.-Y. Hu. An Evaluation Tool for Advanced Traffic Information and Management Systems in Urban Networks. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 2, 1994, pp. 129-147.
15. Levinson, H. S. Bus Transit in the 21st Century: Some Perspectives and Prospects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1760, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 42-46.
16. Diaz, R. B., and D. C. Schneck. Bus Rapid Transit Technologies in the Americas: An Overview. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1731, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
17. Cortés, C. E. High-Coverage Point-to-Point Transit (HCPPT): A New Design Concept and Simulation - Evaluation of Operational Schemes for Future Technological Deployment. Ph.D. dissertation. Henry Samuely School of Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine, 2003.