Breakeven costs of distributed advanced technology water treatment systems

AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 5448-5461

  Norton Jr , John W ^a   Weber Jr , Walter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BYPRODUCTS; COSTS; DEGRADATION; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; WATER QUALITY;

DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT (DBP); DISTRIBUTED TREATMENT SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL TECHNOLOGY; SAMPLE UTILITY;

WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 33645642717     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Background information on treatment methods and distribution systems, 1999. In: Nitrate and Nebraska's small community and rural domestic water supplies: an assessment of problems, needs and alternatives. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, September, 1999.
2. EPA, 2001. Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey. US EPA, Office of Water, EPA 816-R-01-004.
3. EPA, 2002. Community Water System Survey: 2000. US EPA, Office of Water, EPA 815-R-02-005A.
4. Escobar, I. C.; Hong, S.; and Randall, A, 2000. Removal of assimilable organic carbon and biodegradable dissolved organic carbon by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 175(1), 1-17.
5. Frimmel, F.H.; Saravia, F.; Gorenflo, A., 2004. NOM removal from different raw waters by membrane filtration. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply. 4(4), 165-174.
6. Holmes, M. and Oemcke, D, 2002. Optimisation of conventional water treatment processes in Adelaide, South Australia. Water Science and Technology. 2(5-6), 157-163.
7. Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan: Support Document, 2000. South Florida Water Management District, April 2000.
8. Liao, M. and Randtke, S, 1986. Predicting the removal of soluble organic contaminants by lime softening. Water Research. 20(1), 27-35.
9. Norton, Jr., John, W., and Weber, Jr., Walter, J., 2005 (forthcoming). Closed-form solution to water age in municipal distribution systems. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering.
10. Schafer, A. I.; Pihlajamaki, A.; Fane, A. G.; Waite, T.D.; and Nystrom, M., 2004. Natural organic matter removal by nanofiltration: Effects of solution chemistry on retention of low molar mass acids versus bulk organic matter. Journal of Membrane Science. 242(1-2), 73-85.
11. Sohn, J., Amy, G., Cho, J., Lee, Y., and Yoon, Y., 2004. Disinfectant decay and disinfection by-products formation model development: chlorination and ozonation by-products. Water Research. 38, 2461-2478.
12. St. Johns River Water Management District, 1997, Updated with a Projected 2005 Construction Cost Index, In: DRAFT: Consolidated Water Supply Plan: Support Document. South Florida Water Management District, June 2004.
13. Survey of US Costs and Water Rates for Desalination and Membrane Softening Plants, 1997. Water Treatment Technology Program Report No. 24, Water Treatment Engineering and Research Group, Technical Service Center, Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior.
14. U.S. Census Bureau, 2005. American Housing Survey, www.census.gov.
15. Weber, Jr., Walter, J., 2002. Distributed Optimal Technology Networks: A Concept and Strategy for Potable Water Sustainability. Water Science and Technology. 46 (6-7), 241-246.
16. Weber, Jr., Walter, J., 2004. Optimal Uses of Advanced Technologies for Water and Wastewater Treatment in Urban Environments. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply. 4(1), 7-12.