Ranchers vs. ranchettes in California's oak Rangelands

Rangelands

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 17-22

  Wacker, Matthew J ^a   Kelly, N Maggi ^b  

^a Center for Natural Lands Management   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE CHANGE; RANCHING; RANGELAND; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

CALIFORNIA; EL DORADO COUNTY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645640320     PISSN: 01900528     EISSN: 1551501X     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.2111/1551-501X(2004)026.02[0017:RVRICO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allen-Diaz, B. H. and B. A. Holzman. 1993. Resampling VTM plots in blue oak cover type series. Calif. Dept. of Forestry, Forest and Rangeland Resources Assessment Program Pub. 73. Sacramento, Calif.
2. Davis, F., R. Brown, B. Buyan and J. Kealy. 1995. Vegetation change in blue oak and blue oak/foothill pine woodland. Calif. Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest and Rangeland Resource Assessment Program Pub. 34. Sacramento, Calif.
3. El Dorado County Assessor's Office. 2000. El Dorado County Parcel Plat Map and Assessor's Database (GIS Version). Placerville, Calif.
4. California Department of Forestry. 1988. California's Forests and Rangelands: Growing Conflicts Over Changing Uses. Forest and Rangeland Resource Assessment Program. Sacramento, Calif.
5. Fortmann, L. and L. Huntsinger. 1989. The effects of non-metropolitan population growth on resource management. Society and Natur. Resources. 2:9-22.
6. Greenwood, G. and S. Saving. 1999. Current and future patterns of development in El Dorado County. Calif. Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program Pub. 27. Sacramento, Calif.
7. Hansen, A., R. Rasker, B. Maxwell, J. Rotella, J. Johnson, A. Wright, U. Langner, W. Cohen, R. Lawrence and M. Kraska. 2002. Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West. BioScience 52(2):51-168.
8. Holechek, J. 2001. A growing population, rangelands, and the future. Rangelands 23(6):39-43.
9. Huntsinger, L. and L. Fortmann. 1990. California's privately owned oak woodlands: owners, use, and management. J. Range Manage. 43(2):47-152.
10. Huntsinger, L., L. Buttolph and P. Hopkinson. 1997. Ownership and management changes on California hardwood rangelands: 1985 to 1992. J. Range Manage. 50(4):423-430.
11. Maestas, J.D., R.L. Night and W.C. Gilbert. 2003. Biodiversity across nature reserves, ranches, and exurban developments. In: Proc. 56th Annual Soc. Range Manage. Meeting. Casper, Wyo.
12. Major, J. 1951. A functional factorial approach to plant ecology. Ecology. 32:392-411.
13. Saah, D. 2001. Social and Environmental Change in the Sierra Nevada. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Calif. Berkeley, Calif.
14. Saunders, D.A., R.J. Hobbs and C.R. Margules. 1991. The biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Cons. Biol. 5(1):18-32.
15. [CDF] California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2000. Existing vegetation national forests. Fire and Resource Assessment Program. Sacramento, Calif.
16. Teegaurden, D., P. Cassamajor and J. Zivnuska. 1960. Timber marketing and land ownership in the Central Sierra Nevada region. University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences Pub. 71. Berkeley, Calif.
17. USDA 1949. Soil-vegetation maps. USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exper. Station. Berkeley, Calif.
18. Wacker, M. 2002. Land Use and Vegetation Change on El Dorado County, California Rangelands: Implications for Rangeland Conservation. M.S. Thesis. Univ. of Calif. Berkeley, Calif.
19. Walker, P.A., S.J. Marvin, and L.P. Fortmann. 2003. Landscape changes in Nevada County reflect social and ecological transitions. Calif. Agr. 57(4):115-121.
20. Zar, J.H. 1998. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.