Miniconization procedure with C-LETZ conization electrode for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A Swedish study

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 218-223

  Mints, Miriam ^a   Gaberi, Vera ^a   Andersson, Sonia ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

C LETZ electrode; CIN; LLETZ; Miniconization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ELECTRODE; EXCISION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWEDEN; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINA SMEAR;

CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONIZATION; ELECTRODES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 33645635584     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340500345618     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Schiffman MH, Castle P. Epidemiologic studies of a necessary causal risk factor: human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(6):E2.
2. Yu KM, Fung YM, Wong WS. Laser therapy service in Prince of Wales Hospital: follow up study. Hong Kong Practitioner. 1992;14:2097-104.
3. Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(9):1054-60.
4. Prendiville W, Turner M. Large loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet. 1991;337(8741):618.
5. Prendiville W. Large loop excision of the transformation zone. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;9(1):189-220.
6. Chan KS, Kwok CW, Yu KM, Sin SY, Tang LC. A three-year review of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with large loop excision of the transformation zone. Hong Kong Med J. 1997;3(1):21-6.
7. Wong SP, Fung YM, Wong WS. A prospective study of the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in Hong Kong population. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;20(3):289-93.
8. Luesley DM, Cullimore J, Redman CW, Lawton FG, Emens JM, Rollason TP, et al. Loop diathermy excision of the cervical transformation zone in patients with abnormal cervical smears. BMJ. 1990;300(6741):1690-3.
9. Wright TC, Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):295-304.
10. Logsdon-Pokorny VK. Gynecologic surgery during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37(2):294-305.
11. Wright TC, Jr, Richart RM. Loop excision of the uterine cervix. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;7(1):30-4.
12. Bigrigg A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD. Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet. 1994;343(8888):32-4.
13. Fan Q, Tay SK, Shen K. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a valuable method for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2001;36(5):271-4.
14. Houghton SJ, Luesley DM. LLETZ-diathermy loop excision. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:107-9.
15. Oyesanya OA, Amerasinghe C, Manning EA. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;50(1):84-8.
16. Oyesanya OA, Amerasinghe CN, Manning EA. Outpatient excisional management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. A prospective, randomized comparison between loop diathermy excision and laser excisional conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(2):485-8.
17. Baggish MS, Barash F, Noel Y, Brooks M. Comparison of thermal injury zones in loop electrical and laser cervical excisional conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(2):545-8.
18. Murdoch JB, Morgan PR, Lopes A, Monaghan JM. Histological incomplete excision of CIN after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow up, not retreatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99(12):990-3.
19. Panoskaltsis T, Ind TE, Perryman K, Dina R, Abrahams Y, Soutter WP. Needle versus loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2004;111(7):748-53.
20. Byrne P, Ogueh O, Sant-Cassia LJ. Outpatient loop diathermy conisation. Lancet. 1991;337(8746):917-8.
21. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Malamou-Mitsi V, Zikopoulos K, Paschopoulos M, Pappa L, et al. Large loop excision of the transformation zone for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a 12-year experience. Anticancer Res. 2001;21(4B):3097-9.
22. Cullimore J. Management of complications from LLETZ. In: Prendiville W, editor. Large loop excision of the transformation zone: a practical guide, 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall Medical; 1993. p. 93-7.
23. Dunn TS, Killoran K, Wolf D. Complications of outpatient LLETZ procedures. J Reprod Med. 2004;49(2):76-8.
24. Byrne P, Ogueh O, Wilson J, Sant-Cassia LJ. Outpatient loop diathermy cone biopsy. J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;13:130-4.
25. Spitzer M, Chernys AE, Seltzer VL. The use of large-loop excision of the transformation zone in an inner-city population. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(5):731-5.
26. Mossa MA, Carter PG, Abdu S, Young MP, Thomas VA, Barton DP. A comparative study of two methods of large loop excision of the transformation zone. BJOG. 2005;112(4):490-4.