Stented bioprosthetic valve hemodynamics: Is the supra-annular implant better than the intra-annular?

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 238-246

  Badano, Luigi P ^a   Pavoni, Daisy ^a   Musumeci, Sergio ^a   Frassani, Romeo ^a   Gianfagna, Pasquale ^a   Baldassi, Mara ^a   Tursi, Vincenzo ^a   Mazzaro, Enzo ^a   Zakja, Edlira ^a   Fioretti, Paolo M ^a   Livi, Ugolino ^a  

^a SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; FOLLOW UP; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMISSION; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645581257     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-1243
2. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de LA, Jr., et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: Executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Circulation 1998;98:1949-1984
3. Cohn LH. Use of heart valves in older patients. Circulation 2005;111:2152-2153
4. Birkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Grunkemeier GL, Marrin CA, O'Connor GT. Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic alve replacement: A decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1946-1952
5. Jones EL, Weintraub RM, Craver JM, Guyton RA, Shen Y. Interaction of age and coronary artery disease after valve replacement: Implications for valve selection. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:378-384
6. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:893-904
7. Levine MN, Raskob G, Landefeld S, Kearon C. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment. Chest 2001;119:108S-121S
8. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Metras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:211-218
9. Carrier M, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, et al. Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S249-S252
10. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1608-1612
11. Botzenhardt F, Eichinger W, Bleiziffer S, et al. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2054-2060
12. Khan S, Trento A. Is it better on top? The triumph of supra-annular valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:S12-S13
13. Folliguet TA, Le Bret E, Bachet J, Laborde F. Pericarbon pericardial bioprosthesis: An experience based on the lessons of the past. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S289-S292
14. Seguin JR, Grandmougin D, Folliguet T, Warembourg H, Laborde F, Chaptal PA. Long-term results with the Sorin Pericarbon valve in the aortic position: A multicenter study. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:278-282
15. Devereux R, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450-458
16. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer LS, Maurer G. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study. Circulation 1992;85:2275-2283
17. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:637-643
18. Mahon BD, Green BK, von Oppell UO. Aortic valve replacement in elderly women with small aortic roots: Comparing Sorin pericardial and St. Jude Medical mechanical valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5(Suppl.3):S324-S328
19. Badano LP, Rovere EM, Ius P, et al. Importance of using the 'modified' instead of the 'simplified' Bernoulli equation to assess transprosthetic gradients through stentless bioprostheses in the aortic position. Proceedings, 3rd Biennial Meeting, Society of Heart Valve Disease, Vancouver, 2005:253
20. Rahimtoola SH. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch: An update. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:207-210
21. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-1141
22. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108:983-988