The valve of choice in elderly patients and its influence on quality of life: A long-term comparative study

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 180-190

  Kurlansky, Paul A ^a   Williams, Donald B ^b   Traad, Ernest A ^b   Carrillo, Roger G ^b   Schor, John S ^b   Zucker, Melinda ^a   Ebra, George ^a  

^a Florida Heart Research Institute   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT THERAPY; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SHORT FORM 36; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

AGED; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645571742     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, Jr., et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation 1998;98:1949-1984
2. Taylor KM. The United Kingdom heart valve registry: The first 19 years. Heart 1997;77:295-296
3. Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-1243
4. Cohn LH. Use of heart valves in older patients. Circulation 2005;111:2152-2153
5. Schelbert EB, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Welke KF, Rosenthal GE. Hospital volume and selection of valve type in older patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery in the United States. Circulation 2005;111:2178-2182
6. Spencer G. U.S. Bureau of the Census: Projections of the population of the United States, by age, sex and race: 1988-2080. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1989. Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 1018
7. Puvimanasinghe JPA, Steyerberg EW, Takkenberg JJM, et al. Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis: Predictions based on metaanalysis and microsimulation. Circulation 2001;103:1535-1541
8. Sidhu P, O'Kane H, Ali N, et al. Mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in the elderly: A 20-year comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S257-S260
9. Vahanian A. Euro Heart Survey for Valvular Heart Disease. Presented at Anticoagulation in Patients with Heart Valve Disease: State of Practice, Trends and Future Directions. Berlin, Germany, April 21, 2004
10. Kirsch M, Nakashima K, Kubota S, et al. The risk of reoperative heart valve procedures in octogenarian patients. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:991-996
11. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, et al. Reoperation for bioprosthetic mitral structural failure: Risk assessment. Circulation 2003;108(Suppl.):II98-II102
12. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, et al. Reoperation for bioprosthetic aortic structural failure-risk assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:873-878
13. Barnett SD, Halpin LS, Speir AM, et al. Postoperative complications among octogenarians after cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:726-731
14. Kurlansky PA, Williams DB, Traad EA, et al. The influence of coronary artery disease on quality of life after mechanical valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:260-271
15. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass., 1993
16. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. 2nd edn. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass., 1994
17. Rubin DB. Estimated causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:757-763
18. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Statist Assoc 1984;79:516-524
19. Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. Chapman & Hall, London, 1984
20. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 1958;53:457-481
21. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:163-170
22. Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:893-904
23. Khan SS, Trento A, DeRobertis M, et al. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:257-269
24. Potter DD, Sundt TM, III, Zehr KJ, et al. Operative risk of reoperative aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:94-103
25. Potter DD, Sundt TM, III, Zehr KJ, et al. Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:67-72
26. Asimakopoulos G, Edwards MB, Taylor KM. Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older. Circulation 1997;96:3403-3408
27. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: Final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1152-1158
28. Horstkotte D, Piper C. Improvement of oral anticoagulation therapy by INR self-management. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:335-338
29. Peterseim DS, Cen YY, Cheruvu S, et al. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:890-897
30. Cohen G, David TE, Ivanov J, et al. The impact of age, coronary artery disease, and cardiac comorbidity on late survival after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:273-284
31. Burr LH, Jamieson WRE, Munro AI, et al. Structural valve deterioration in elderly patient populations with the Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: A comparative study. J Heart Valve Dis 1992;1:87-91
32. Cen YY, Glower DD, Landolfo K, et al. Comparison of survival after mitral valve replacement with biologic and mechanical valves in 1139 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:569-577
33. Birkmeyer NJO, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson ANA, et al. Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: A decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1946-1952