Random-effect models for ordinal responses: Application to self-reported disability among older persons

Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 61-72

  Carriere I ^a   Bouyer, J ^b,c,d  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b INSERM Unité 569   (United States)

^c INED   (France)

^d IFR69   (France)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; Longitudinal studies; Ordinal response; Random effects models

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PAIN; RANDOMIZATION; RISK FACTOR; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; WALKING SPEED;

EID: 33645568796     PISSN: 03987620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0398-7620(06)76695-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 1970; 10: 20-30.
2. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179-86.
3. Long JS, Pavalko E. Comparing alternative measures of functional limitation. Med Care 2004; 42: 19-27.
4. Simonsick EM, Kasper JD, Guralnik JM, Bandeen-Roche K, Ferracci L, Hirsch R, et al. Severity of upper and lower extremity functional limitation: scale development and validation with self-report and performance-based measures of physical function. WHAS Research Group. Women's Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2001; 56: S10-9.
5. Beckett L, Brock D, Lemke J, Mendes-De Leon C, Guralnik J, Fillenbaum G, et al. Analysis of change in self-reported physical function among older persons in four population studies. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 766-78.
6. Diggle P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford: Clarendon Press / Oxford Science Publications, 1994.
7. Lindsey J. A review of some extensions to generalized linear models. Stat Med 1999; 18: 2223-36.
8. Zeger S, Liang K, Albert P. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 1049-60.
9. Pinheiro J Bates D. Approximations to the log-likelihood function in the nonlinear mixed-effects model. J Comput Graph Stat 1995; 4: 12-35.
10. Ananth C, Kleinbaum D. Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: 1323-33.
11. Lall R, Campbell M, Walters S, Morgan K. A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments. Stat Methods Med Res 2002; 11: 49-67.
12. Mc Cullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). J R Statist Soc B 1980; 42: 109-42.
13. nd ed. Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington DC: Chapman & Hall / CRC, 1989.
14. Hedeker D, Mermelstein R. A multilevel thresholds of change model for analysis of stages of change data. Multivariate Behavior Res 1998; 33: 427-55.
15. Peterson B, Harrell F. Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Applied Statistics 1990; 39: 205-17.
16. Whitehead A, Omar RZ, Higgins JP, Savaluny E, Turner RM, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of ordinal outcomes using individual patient data. Stat Med 2001; 20: 2243-60.
17. Marinacci C, Schifano P, Borgia P, Perucci CA. Application of random effect ordinal regression model for outcome evaluation of two randomized controlled trials. Stat Med 2001; 20: 3769-76.
18. Leon AC, Hedeker D. A mixed-effects quintile-stratified propensity adjustment for effectiveness analyses of ordered categorical doses. Stat Med 2005; 24: 647-58.
19. Armstrong B, Sloan M. Ordinal regression models for epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 191-204.
20. Cole S, Ananth C. Regression models for unconstrained, partially or fully constrained continuation odds ratios. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1379-82.
21. Greenland S. Alternative models for ordinal logistic regression. Stat Med 1994; 13: 1665-77.
22. Dos Santos DM, Berridge DM. A continuation ratio random effects model for repeated ordinal responses. Stat Med 2000; 19: 3377-88.
23. Engel J. Polytomous logistic regression. Stat Neerlandica 1988; 42: 233-52.
24. Lunt M. Prediction of ordinal outcomes when the association between predictors and outcome differs between outcome levels. Stat Med 2005; 24: 1357-69.
25. nd ed. London: HC Chapman, 2000.
26. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: Wiley / Interscience Publication, 1990.
27. Vonesh E, Chinchilli V, Pu K. Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models. Biometrics 1996; 52: 572-87.
28. Dargent-Molina P, Favier F, Grandjean H, Baudoin C, Schott A, Hausherr E, et al. Fall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996; 348: 145-9.
29. Breslow N, Clayton D. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 1993; 88: 9-25.
30. Wolfinger R, O'Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Statist Comput Simul 1993; 48: 233-43.
31. Breslow N. Bias correction in generalised linear mixed models with a single component of dispersion. Biometrika 1995; 82: 81-91.
32. Rodriguez G, Goldman N. An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses. J R Statist Soc A 1995; 158: 73-89.
33. Heo M, Leon AC. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations. Stat Med 2005; 24: 911-23.
34. Zeger S, Karim M. Generalized linear models with random effects: a Gibbs sampling approach. J Am Stat Assoc 1991; 86: 79-86.
35. Stram DO, Lee JW. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 1994; 50: 1171-7.