Selecting committees

Public Choice

Volumn 126, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 343-355

  Ratliff, Thomas C ^a  

^a WHEATON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645567750     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-006-1747-5     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bock, H. E., Day, W. H. E., & McMorris, F. R. (1998). Consensus rule for committee elections. Mathematical Social Sciences. 35(3), 219-232.
2. Brams, S. J., Kilgour, D. M., & Sanver, M. R. (2004). A minimax procedure for electing committees. Preprint.
3. Chamberlin, J. R., & Courant, P. N. (1977). Representative deliberations and representative decisions: Proportional representation and the borda rule. The American Political Science Review, 77(3), 718-733.
4. Fishburn, P. C. (1981). An analysis of simple voting systems for electing committees. SIAM Jorunal on Applied Mathematics, 41(3), 499-502.
5. Gehrlein, W. V. (1985). The condorcet criterion and committee selection. Mathematical Social Sciences, 10(3), 199-209.
6. Kaymak, B., & Sanver, M. (2003). Sets of alternatives as condorcet winners. Social Choice and Welfare. 20(3). 477-494.
7. Ratliff, T. (2003). Some startling inconsistencies when electing committees. Social Choice and Welfare. 21(3), 433-454.
8. Saari, D. G. (2001). Decisions and Elections: Explaining the Unexpected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Saari, D. G. (2004). Analyzing pairwise voting rules. In M. Wiberg (Ed.), Reasoned Choices, Finnish Political Science Association, 318-342.