Meta-analysing community action projects in Aotearoa New Zealand

Community Development Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 143-159

  Greenaway, Alison ^a   Witten, Karen ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; DECISION MAKING; META-ANALYSIS;

AUSTRALASIA; NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 33645548900     PISSN: 00103802     EISSN: 14682656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsi053     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allen, W., Kilvington, M. and Horn, C. (2002) Using participatory and learning-based approaches for environmental management to help achieve constructive behaviour change (Landcare Research Contract Report LC0102/ 057 Prepared for Ministry for the Environment), May, Landcare, Lincoln.
2. Blaxter, L., Farnell, R. and Watts, J. (2003) Difference, ambiguity and the potential for learning - local communities working in partnership with local government, Community Development Journal, 38, 130-139.
3. Cabinet Office (2000) Stronger Communities Action Fund, Cabinet Paper EXG (00)118. November, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Wellington, New Zealand.
4. Casswell, S. (2001) Community capacity building and social policy - what can be achieved? Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 17, 22-35.
5. Casswell, S. and Stewart, L. (1989) A community action project on alcohol: Community organization and its evaluation, Community Health Studies, 13, 39-48.
6. Cochrane Collaboration (2003) Structure of a Cochrane Review, Cochrane Collaboration, 18 March 2004, available at http://www.cochrane.org/ reviews/revstruc.htm
7. Conway, K., Tunks, M., Henwood, W. and Casswell, S. (2000) To Whanau Cadillac - A Waka for Change, Health Education and Behaviour, 27, 339-350.
8. Department of Internal Affairs (2002) A Framework for Developing Sustainable Communities, Department of Internal Affairs, Wellington, New Zealand, available at http://www.dia.govt.nz
9. Florax, R., de Groot, H. and de Mooij, R. (2002) Meta-Analysis: A Tool for Upgrading Inputs of Macroeconomic Policy Models, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2002-041/3, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, available at http://www.tinbergen.nl
10. Friere, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
11. Greenaway, A., Milne, S., Henwood, W., Asiasiga, L. and Witten, K. (2003a) A Meta Analysis of Community Action Projects, Vol. I, Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation (SHORE), Massey University, Auckland, available at http://www.shore.ac.nz/projects/ projects_9.htm
12. Greenaway, A., Milne, S., Henwood, W., Asiasiga, L. and Witten, K. (2003b) A Meta Analysis of Community Action Projects, Vol. II, Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation (SHORE), Massey University, Auckland, available at http://www.shore.ac.nz/projects/ projects_9.htm
13. Holder, H. D. (2000) Community prevention of alcohol problems, Addictive Behaviors, 25, 843-859.
14. Hunter, J. and Schmidt, F. (1990) Methods of integrating findings across studies, in Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 468-489.
15. Labonte, R. (1990) Empowerment: Notes on professional and community dimensions, Canadian Review of Social Policy, 26, 64-75.
16. Laverack, G. (2001) An identification and interpretation of organizational aspects of community improvement, Community Development Journal, 36, 40-52.
17. Ledwith, M. (1997) Participating in Transformation: Towards a Working Model of Community Empowerment, Ventura Press, Birmingham.
18. Lewin, K. (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers, edited by Dorwin Cartwright Tavistock, London.
19. McCreanor, T., Moewaka Barnes, H. and Mathews, T. (1998) Limited Impact Evaluation for the Waikato Rural Drink Drive Project, Alcohol & Public Health Research Unit, Auckland.
20. Ministry of Health (2003) Community Project Indicators Framework (CPIF) - Its Use in Community Projects (Working draft), Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
21. Moewaka Barnes, H. (2000) Collaboration in community action: A successful partnership between indigenous communities and researchers, Health Promotion International, 15, 17-25.
22. Nijkamp, P. and Pepping, G. (1998) A meta-analytic evaluation of sustainable city initiatives, Urban Studies, 35, 1481-1501.
23. Panelli, R. (2001) Narratives of community and change in a contemporary rural setting: The case of Duaringa, Queensland, Australian Geographical Studies, 39, 156-166.
24. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2001) Handbook of Action Research, Sage Publications Ltd., London.
25. Sankaran, S., Dick, B., Passfield, R. and Swepson, P. (eds) (2001) Effective Change Management Using Action Learning and Action Research: Concepts, Frameworks, Processes, Applications. Southern Cross University Press, Lismore.
26. Smith, S., Willms, D. and Johnson, N. (1997) Nurtured by Knowledge: Learning to Do Participatory Action Research, The Apex Press, New York.
27. Social Exclusion Unit (2001) A New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal: National Strategy for Action, ODPM Publications, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, available at http://www.socialexclusionunit.gov.uk/ publications/reports/html/action_plan/index.htm
28. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994) Grounded theory methodology, in N. K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, eds, The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 273-285.
29. Valentine, G. (2001) Social Geographies: Space and Society, Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex.
30. Wood, M. (2002) Resident Participation in Urban and Community Renewal, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute - UNSW/UWS Research Centre, Melbourne, available at http://www.housing.infoxchange.net.au/ library/ahin/social_housing/items/00003-upload-00001.pdf