Ultrastructural organization of the anal organs in the anal capsule of Craterostigmus tasmanianus Pocock, 1902 (Chilopoda, Craterostigmomorpha)

Journal of Morphology

Volumn 267, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 265-272

  Rosenberg, Jörg ^a   Müller, Carsten H G ^b   Hilken, Gero ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Centipedes; Coxal organ; Epidermal glands; Myriapoda; Pleurostigmophora; Transport epithelium

Indexed keywords

ANAL CANAL; ANIMAL; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EPITHELIUM; HISTOLOGY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANAL CANAL; ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; EPITHELIUM; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON;

CHILOPODA; CRATEROSTIGMOMORPHA; CRATEROSTIGMUS TASMANIANUS; GEOPHILOMORPHA; LITHOBIOMORPHA; MYRIAPODA; PLEUROSTIGMOPHORA;

EID: 33645541936     PISSN: 03622525     EISSN: 10974687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10401     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Archey G. 1916. The occurrence in New Zealand of Craterostigmus tasmanianus Pocock (Chilopoda). Trans N Z Inst 49:319-320.
2. Bitsch J, Palévody C. 1973. L'épithélium absorbant des véscules coxales des Machilides (Insecta, Thysanura). Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 143:169-182.
3. Borucki H. 1996. Evolution und phylogenetisches System der Chilopoda (Mandibulata, Tracheata). Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg (NF) 35:95-226.
4. Borucki H, Rosenberg J. 1997. Transport-active organs within the "ano-genital" capsule of Craterostigmus tasmanianus (Chilopoda, Craterostigmomorpha). Zoomorphology 117:49-52.
5. Dohle W. 1985. Phylogenetic pathways in the Chilopoda. Bijdr Dierkd 55:55-66.
6. Dohle W. 1990. Some observations on morphology and affinities of Craterostigmus tasmanianus (Chilopoda). In: Minelli A, editor. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Myriapodology. Leiden: Brill. p 69-79.
7. Edgecombe G. 2003a. A new genus of henicopid centipede (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) from New Caledonia. Mem Queensl Mus 49:269-284.
8. Edgecombe G. 2003b. A new species of the Gondwanan centipede Anopsobius (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) from New South Wales, Australia. Zootaxa 204:1-15.
9. Edgecombe GD, Giribet G, Wheeler WC. 2002. Phylogeny of Henicopidae (Chilopda: Lithobiomorpha): a combined analysis of morphology and five molecular loci. Syst Entomol 27:31-64.
10. Eisenbeis G. 1974. Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Ultrastruktur des Transportepithels am Ventraltubus arthropleoner Collembolen (Insecta). Cytobiology 9:180-202.
11. Eisenbeis G. 1976. Zur Feinstruktur und Histochemie des Transportepithels abdominaler Koxalblasen der Doppelschwanz-Art Campodes staphylinus (Diplura: Campodeidae). Entomol Germ 3:185-201.
12. Greven H, Rosenberg J, Latka I. 1997. Cytochemical notes on the specialized cuticle of the coxal organs in Lithobius forficatus: application of lectins and demonstration of chitin (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Entomol Scand Suppl 51:71-76.
13. Hilken G. 1997. Tracheal systems in Chilopoda: a comparison under phylogenetic aspects. Entomol Scand Suppl 51:49-60.
14. Hilken G. 1998. Vergleich von Tracheensystemen unter phylogenetischem Aspekt. Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg (NF) 37:1-91.
15. Hilken G, Brockmann C, Rosenberg J. 2003. The maxillary organ gland: description of a new head gland in Scutigera coleoptrata (Chilopoda, Notostigmophora). Afr Invert 44:175-184.
16. Hilken G, Rosenberg J, Brockmann C. 2005. Ultrastructure of the epidermal maxilla II-gland of Scutigera coleoptrata (Chilopoda, Notostigmophora) and the ground pattern of epidermal gland organs in Myriapoda. J Morphol 264:53-61.
17. Karnovsky MJ. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137-138.
18. Küppers J, Thurm U. 1983. Water transport by electro-osmosis. In: Locke M, Smith E, editors. Insect biology in future. London: Academic Press. p 125-144.
19. Lewis JGE. 1981. The biology of centipedes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mesibov R. 1995. Distribution and ecology of the centipede Craterostigmus tasmanianus Pocock, 1902 (Chilopoda: Craterostigmomorpha: Craterostigmidae) in Tasmania. Tasm Nat 117:2-7.
21. Müller CHG, Rosenberg J, Meyer-Rochow VB. 2003. Hitherto undescribed interommatidial exocrine glands in Chilopoda. Afr Invert 44:185-197.
22. Noirot C, Noirot-Thimothée C. 1971. Ultrastructure de proctodéum chez le Thysanure Lepismodes inquilinus Newman (= Thermobia domestica Packard). II. Le sac anal. J Ultrastruct Res 37:335-350.
23. Pocock RJ. 1902. A new and annectant type of chilopod. Q J Microsc Sci (NS) 45:417-448.
24. Rosenberg J. 1982. Coxal organs in Geophilomorpha (Chilopoda). Organization and fine structure of the transporting epithelium. Zoomorphology 100:107-120.
25. Rosenberg J. 1983a. Coxal organs of Lithobius forficatus (Myriapoda, Chilopoda): fine structural investigation with special reference to the transport epithelium. Cell Tissue Res 230:421-430.
26. Rosenberg J. 1983b. Coxal organs in Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda): topography, organization, fine structure and signification in Centipedes. Zool Jahrb Anat Ontog Tiere 110:383-393.
27. Rosenberg J. 1984. Ultrastructure of the anal organs in the larval stages of Lithobius forficatus L. (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 13:25-29.
28. Rosenberg J. 1985. Untersuchungen zur feinstrukturellen Organisation und Funktion der Coxal- und Analorgane bei Chilopoden. Bijdr Dierkd 55:337-344.
29. Rosenberg J. 1989. Untersuchungen zur funktionellen Morphologie der Analorgane von Geophilidae (Geophilomorpha). In: Minelli A, editor. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Myriapodology. Leiden: Brill. p 115-123.
30. Rosenberg J, Bajorat KH. 1984. Einfluß der Coxalorgane von Lithobius forficatus L. (Chilopoda) auf die Sorption von Wasserdampf. Zool Jahrb Physiol 88:337-344.