Subjective video quality evaluation for multimedia applications

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6057, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Huynh Thu, Quan ^a,b   Ghanbari, Mohammed ^b   Hands, David ^c   Brotherton, Matthew ^c  

^a Psytechnics Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c BRITISH TELECOM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ACR; MOS; Multimedia; Subjective assessment; Video quality

Indexed keywords

LABORATORIES; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TELEVISION;

ACR; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; VIDEO QUALITY;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 33645527411     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.641703     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. International Telecommunication Union, "ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures," 2002.
2. International Telecommunication Union, "ITU-T Recommendation P.910: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications," September 1999.
3. International Telecommunication Union, "ITU-T Recommendation J.144: Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference," March 2004.
4. International Telecommunication Union, "ITU-R Recommendation BT.1683: Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for standard definition digital broadcast television in the presence of a full reference," June 2004.
5. A. Watson and A. Sasse, "Measuring perceived quality of speech and video in multimedia conferencing applications," in Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference, pp. 55-60, September 1998.
6. M. Pinson and S. Wolf, "Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies," in Proceedings of SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing, 5150, July 2003.
7. M. Pinson and S. Wolf, "The impact of monitor resolution and type on subjective video quality testing," Technical Memorandum TM-04-412, NTIA/ITS, 2004.
8. I.E.G. Richardson and S. Kannangara, "Fast subjective video quality measurement with user feedback," Electronic Letters 40(13), pp. 799-800, 2004.
9. T. Alpert et al., "Subjective evaluation of MPEG-4 video codec proposals: Methodological approach and test procedures," Signal Processing: Image Communication 9, pp. 305-325, May 1997.
10. C. Fenimore, V. Baroncini, T. Oelbaum, and T. Tan, "Subjective testing methodology in mpeg video verification," in Proceedings of SPIE Photonic Devices and Algorithms for Computing VI, 5558, pp. 503-511, November 2004.
11. M. Masry, S. Hemami, A. Rohaly, and W. Osberger, "Subjective quality evaluation of low bit rate video," in Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, pp. 102-113, June 2001.
12. S. Winkler and F. Dufaux, "Video quality evaluation for mobile applications," in Proceedings of SPIE Visual Communication and Image Processing, 5150, pp. 593-603, July 8-11 2003.
13. S. Winkler and R. Campos, "Video quality evaluation for internet streaming applications," in Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, 5007, pp. 104-115, January 20-24 2003.
14. P. Brun, G. Hauske, and T. Stockhammer, "Subjective assessment of H.264-AVC video for low-bitrate multimedia messaging services," in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2, pp. 1145-1148, October 2004.
15. Q. Huynh-Thu and M. Ghanbari, "A comparison of subjective video quality assessment methods for low-bit rate and low-resolution video," in Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, August 2005.
16. Video Quality Experts Group, "VQEG multimedia test plan," November 2005. Latest version available at http://www.vqeg.org.