Stabilising viewing distances in subjective assessment of mobile vodeo

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6057, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Brotherton, Matthew D ^a   Hands, David S ^a   Brunnström, Kjell ^b   Jonsson, Jimmy ^b   Soysuren, Öscan A ^b  

^a BRITISH TELECOM   (United Kingdom)

^b ACREO AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Mobile; Subjective Assessment; Video; Viewing Distance

Indexed keywords

IMAGE COMPRESSION; IMAGE QUALITY; MOBILE COMPUTING; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY; STANDARDS;

MOBILE; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; VIDEO; VIEWING DISTANCE;

MOTION PICTURES;

EID: 33645518120     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.644595     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Byrne, D., Colour Blindness Tests, [on-line], http://www.kcl.ac.uk/teares/gktvc/vc/lt/colourblindness/platel.htm, Accessed: 1 Mar. 2005
2. Pinson and S. Wolf, "The impact of monitor resolution and type on subjective video quality testing," NTIA. Technical Memorandum TM-04-412
3. Video Quality Experts Group, www.vqeg.org.
4. ITU-T Recommendation P.910: "Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications." International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996.
5. ITU-T Rec. P.910, "Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications", Geneva, 1999.
6. P. Corriveau, C. Gojmerac, B. Hughes, L. Stelmach, "All subjective scales are not created equal: The effects of context on different scales", Signal Processing 77 (1999) 1}9.
7. M. Pinson and S. Wolf, "Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies," SPIE Video Communications and Image Processing Conference, Lugano, Switzerland, Jul. 8-11 2003.
8. VQEG, "Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment," http://www.vqeg.org/, Mar. 2000.