Correction and induction of high-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided LASIK and their influence on the postoperative contrast sensitivity;Korrektur und induktion von aberrationen höherer ordnung nach standard- und wellenfrontgeführter LASIK und deren auswirkungen auf das postoperative kontrastsehen

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 223, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 217-224

  Hammer, Thomas ^a   Heynemann, M ^a   Naumann, I ^a   Duncker, G I W ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aberrations; Contrast sensitivity; LASIK; Wavefront

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; REFRACTION ERROR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33645514811     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858864     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bailey MD et al. The effect of LASIK on best-corrected high-and low-contrast visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 362-368
2. Chalita MR, Krueger RR. Correlation of aberrations with visual acuity and symptoms. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2004; 17; 135-142
3. Gießler S, Hammer T, Duncker GIW. Aberrometrie in Mydriasis - welche Art der Mydriasis ist zu bevorzugen? Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002; 219: 655-659
4. Hammer T, Duncker GIW, Gießler S. Ergebnisse der wellenfrontgestützten LASIK. Ophthalmologe 2004; 101: 824-829
5. Hammer T, Giessler S, Duncker GIW et al. Corneal wound healing after hyperopic PRK and LASIK. Ophthalmologe 2005; 102: 39-45
6. Kaiserman I et al. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 454-457
7. Kanjani N et al. Wavefront- and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 398-402
8. Kim TI, Yang SJ, Tchah H. Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix. J Refract Surg 2004; 20: 432-438
9. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg 2001; 17: S596-601
10. McLellan JS, Marcos S, Burns SA. Age-related changes in monochromatic wave aberrations of the human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 1390-1395
11. Montes-Mico R, Espana E, Menezo JL. Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2003; 19: 353-356
12. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J Refract Surg 2000; 16: 116-121
13. Quesnel NM et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1209-1218
14. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg 2001; 16: 407-413
15. Seiler T, Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M. Operative correction of ocular aberrations to improve visual acuity. J Refract Surg 2000; 16: 619-622
16. Spraul CW. Wellenfrontkorrektur: Ein falsches Versprechen oder nur ein Misnomer. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2004; 221: 455-455
17. Tumbocon JA et al. The effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on low contrast vision. J Refract Surg 2004; 20 (Suppl 5): 689-692
18. Yamane N et al. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3986-3990
19. Yoon G et al. Causes of spherical aberration induced by laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refr Surg 2005; 31: 127-135