Implications of unchanged detection criteria with CAD as second reader of mammograms

Medical Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 922-929

  Bornefalk, Hans ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CAD; Decision theory; Mammography; Optimal operating points; Second reader

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DECISION THEORY; MAMMOGRAPHY;

BAYESIAN DECISION THEORY; COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION SYSTEMS; DECISION CRITERIONS; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; OPTIMAL OPERATING POINT; PLAUSIBLE ASSUMPTIONS; SECOND READER; SEQUENTIAL SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

EID: 33645510446     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.2179148     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. R. Smith-Bindman, " Comparison of screening mammography in United States and the United Kingdom., " J. Am. Med. Assoc. 290, 2129-2137 (2003).
2. D. Gur, " Recall and detection rates in screening mammography: A review of clinical experience-Implications for practice guidelines., " Cancer 100, 1590-1594 (2004).
3. T. W. Freer and M. J. Ulissey, " Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center., " Radiology 220, 781-786 (2001).
4. D. Gur, " Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system., " J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96, 185-190 (2004).
5. R. L. Birdwell, P. Bandodkar, and D. M. Ikeda, " Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting., " Radiology 236, 451-457 (2005).
6. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern Classification, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2001).
7. C. E. Metz, " Basic principles of ROC analysis., " Semin Nucl. Med. 8, 283-298 (1978).
8. D. R. Grey and B. J. T. Morgan, " Some aspects of ROC curve-fitting: normal and logistic models., " J. Math. Psychol. 9, 128-139 (1972).
9. E. J. Halpern, M. Albert, A. M. Krieger, C. E. Metz, and A. D. Maidment, " Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of optimal operating points., " Acad. Radiol. 3, 245-253 (1996).
10. L. A. G. Ries, in SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2002, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, 2005 http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2002.
11. S. B. Cantor, C. C. Sun, G. Tortolero-Luna, R. Richards-Kortum, and M. Follen, " A comparison of C/B ratios from studies using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis., " J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52, 885-892 (1999).
12. E. D. Pisano, " Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening., " N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1773-1783 (2005).
13. D. P. Chakraborty and L. H. L. Winter, " Free-response methodology: alternative analysis and a new observer-performance experiment., " Radiology 174, 873-881 (1990).