Predicting subjective video quality from separated spatial and temporal assessment

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6057, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Pastrana Vidal, Ricardo R ^a   Gicquel, Jean C ^a   Blin, Jean L ^a   Cherifi, Hocine ^b  

^a ORANGE LABS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Artifacts; Assessment; Blur; Clearness; Coding; Fluidity; Jerky motion; Modeling; Perceptual interactions; Sharpness; Streaming video; Subjective quality

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION; FLUIDITY; IMAGE CODING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTION PICTURES; PACKET NETWORKS;

ARTIFACTS; ASSESSMENT; BLUR; PERCEPTUAL INTERACTIONS; STREAMING VIDEO; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 33645509357     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.642952     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. W. Li, "Overview of fine granularity scalability in mpeg-4 video standard," Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on 11(3), pp. 301-317, 2001.
2. L. Contin and S. Battista, "Performance evaluation of video coding schemes working at very low bit rates," in Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1994- ICASSP-94-, 1994 IEEE International Conference on, 5, pp. 409-412, IEEE, (Adelaide, Australia), 1994.
3. M. Masry, S. S. Hemami, W. Osberger, and A. M. Rohaly, "Subjective quality evaluation of low bit rate video," in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI, 4299, pp. 102-113, SPIE, (San José, CA.), 2001.
4. F. Speranza, A. Vincent, D. Wang, A. Mainguy, P. Blanchfield, and R. Renaud, "Rate control for improved picture quality in low bit rate video coding," in SPIE, Visual Communications and Image Processing, C. J. Kuo, ed., 4671, pp. 722-733, SPIE, (San José, CA.), 2002.
5. J.-L. Blin, "SAMVIQ - subjective assessment methodology for video quality," Tech. Rep. BPN 056, EBU Project Group B/VIM Video In Multimedia, May 2003.
6. B.-. ITU-R Recommendation, "Méthodologie d'Évaluation subjective de la qualité des images de télévision," Tech. Rep. BT.500-9, ITU, November 1998.
7. B.-. ITU-R Recommendation, "Specifications and alignment procedures for setting of brightness and contrast of displays," Tech. Rep. BT.814-1, ITU, July 1994.
8. J.-L. Blin, "SEOVQ software tool for quality, preference and acceptability evaluation of multimedia images," Tech. Rep. FT.BD.FTR & D DIH EQS 462 02 JLB, France Telecom R & D, October 2002.
9. R. Aldridge, J. Davidoff, M. Ghanbari, D. Hands, and D. Pearson, "Recency effect in the subjective assessment of digitally-coded television pictures," in Image Processing and its Applications, 1995., Fifth International Conference on, pp. 336-339, (Edinburgh UK), 1995.
10. R. R. Pastrana-Vidal, J.-C. Gicquel, C. Colomes, and H. Cherifi, "Sporadic frame dropping impact on quality perception," in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IX, 5292, pp. 182-193, SPIE, (San José), 2004.
11. R. R. Pastrana-Vidai, J.-C. Gicquel, C. Colomes, and H. Cherifi, "Temporal masking effect on dropped frames at video scene cuts," in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IX, 5292, pp. 194-2001, SPIE, 2004.
12. W. J. Tam, L. B. Stelmach, L. Wang, D. Lauzon, and P. Gray, "Visual masking at video scene cuts," in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display VI, 2411, pp. 111-119, SPIE, (San José, CA.), 1995.
13. R. R. Pastrana-Vidai, J.-C. Gicquel, C. Colomes, and H. Cherifi, "Frame dropping effects on user quality perception," in WIAMIS (Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services), (Lisboa), 2004.
14. J. Lagarias, J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, and P. E. Wright, "Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions," SIAM Journal of Optimization 9(1), pp. 112-147, 1998.
15. A. M. Rohaly, J. Libert, P. Corriveau, and A. Webster, "Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment," tech. rep., VQEG, March 2000.