Potential crash involvement of young novice drivers with previous crash and citation records

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1937, 2005, Pages 1-6

  Chandraratna, Susantha ^a   Stamatiadis, Nikiforos ^b   Stromberg, Arnold ^c  

^a WOOLPERT INC   (United States)

^b 265 Raymond Building   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DRIVER LICENSING; LOGISTICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

CRASH PREDICTION MODEL; DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; HIGH-RISK DRIVERS;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS;

EID: 33645504271     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0361198105193700101     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Williams, A. F. Graduated Licensing Comes to the United States. Injury Prevention, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1999, pp. 133-135.
2. Elliott, M. R., P. F. Waller, T. E. Raghunathan, and J. T. Shope. Predicting Offenses and Crashes from Young Drivers' Offence and Crash Histories. Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2001, pp. 167-178.
3. Kirk, A., and N. Stamatiadis. Crash Rates and Traffic Maneuvers of Young Drivers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1779, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 68-74.
4. McKnight, J. A., and A. S. McKnight. Young Novice Drivers: Careless or Clueless? Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2003, pp. 921-925.
5. Harrison, W. A. Investigation of the Driving Experience of a Sample of Victorian Learner Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2004, pp. 885-891.
6. Twisk, D. A. M. Young Driver Accidents in Europe: Magnitude and Nature. In New to the Road: Reducing the Risks for Young Motorists (H. Simpson, ed.), Youth Enhancement Service, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif., 1996, pp. 27-33.
7. Kentucky Traffic Collision Facts. Kentucky Transportation Center, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, 2002.
8. Put the Brakes on Fatalities Day. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/fourthlevel/brakes_facts.htm. Accessed Oct. 13, 2003.
9. Blasco, R. D., J. M. Prieto, and J. M. Cornejo. Accident Probability After Accident Occurrence. Safety Science, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2003, pp. 481-501.
10. Hauer, E., B. N. Persaud, A. Smiley, and D. Duncan. Estimating the Accident Potential of an Ontario Driver. Accident Analysis & Prevention. Vol. 23, No. 2/3, 1991, pp. 133-152.
11. Peck, R. C., and R. S. Coppin. The Prediction of Accident Involvement Using Concurrent Driver Record Data. Research Review (National Safety Council), Vol. 11, 1967, pp. 34-41.
12. Gebers, M. A. Strategies for Estimating Drive Accident Risk in Relation to California's Negligent-Operator Point System. Technical Monograph 183. California Department of Motor Vehicles, Research and Development Branch, Sacramento, 1999.
13. Gebers, M. A., and R. C. Peck. Using Traffic Conviction Correlates to Identify High Accident-Risk Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 35, 2003, pp. 903-912.
14. Title XVI - Motor Vehicles. In Kentucky Revised Statutes, Kentucky Legislature, 2003, Chaps. 186-189.
15. Chen, W., P. Cooper, and M. Pinili. Driver Accident Risk in Relation to the Penalty Point System in British Columbia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1995, pp. 9-18.
16. Peck, R. C., R. S. McBride, and R. S. Coppin. The Distribution and Prediction of Driver Accident Frequencies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.2, 1971, pp. 243-299.
17. Stamatiadis, N., and J. A. Deacon. Trends in Highway Safety: Effects of an Aging Population on Accident Propensity. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1995, pp. 443-459.
18. Johnson, D. E. Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysts. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif., 1998.
19. Norusis, M. J. SPSS Regression Models 10.0. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, 111., 1999.
20. Masten, S. V., and R. C. Peck. Problem Driver Remediation: A Meta-Analysis of the Driver Improvement Literature. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Va., 2003.
21. Zweig, M. H., and G. Campbell. Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) Plots: A Fundamental Evaluation Tool in Clinical Medicine. Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1993, pp. 561-577.