High-throughput synthesis and screening of a library of random and gradient copoly(2-oxazoline)s

Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 145-148

  Hoogenboom, Richard ^a   Fijten, Martin W M ^a   Wijnans, Sanne ^a   Van Den Berg, Antje M J ^a   Thijs, Hanneke M L ^a   Schubert, Ulrich S ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYES, REAGENTS, INDICATORS, MARKERS AND BUFFERS; OXAZOLE DERIVATIVE; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; KINETICS; SYNTHESIS;

INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OXAZOLES; POLYMERS;

EID: 33645498766     PISSN: 15204766     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/cc050087q     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Tomalia, D. A.; Sheetz, D. P. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 1966, 4, 2253-2265.
2. Seeliger, W.; Aufderhaar, E.; Diepers, W.; Feinauer, R.; Nehring, R.; Thier, W.; Hellmann, H. Angew. Chem. 1966, 20, 913-927.
3. Kagiya, T.; Narisawa, S.; Maeda, T.; Fukui, K. Polym. Lett. 1966, 4, 441-445.
4. Aoi, K.; Okada, M. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1996, 21, 151-208.
5. Kobayashi, S.; Uyama, H. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 192-209.
6. Christova, D.; Velichkova, R.; Loos, W.; Goethals, E. J.; Du Prez, F. E. Polymer 2003, 44, 2255-2261.
7. Levy, A.; Litt, M. J. Polym. Sci., Part A1 1968, 6, 1883-1894.
8. Cai, G.; Litt, M. H. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 1993, 30, 649-657.
9. Guinot, P.; Bryant, L.; Chow, T. Y.; Saegusa, T. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 1-17.
10. Kagiya, T.; Matsuda, T.; Nakato, M.; Hirata, R. J. Macromol. Sci., Chem. 1972, A6, 1631-1652.
11. Hoogenboom, R.; Fijten, M. W. M.; Schubert, U. S. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 1830-1840.
12. For a detailed description of the synthesis robot, see: Hoogenboom, R.; Schubert, U. S. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2003, 41, 2425-2434.
13. The monomer conversion was calculated from the ratio of monomer to solvent (DMAc), whereby the solvent was applied as internal standard.
14. AB).
15. Madruga, E. L. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 1879-1924.
16. Ziegler, M. J.; Matyjaszewksi, K. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 415-424.
17. Saegusa, T.; Kobayashi, S.; Yamada, A. Makromol. Chem. 1976, 177, 2271-2283.
18. Mayo, F. R.; Lewis, F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1594-1601.
19. Kelen, T.; Tüdös, F.; Turcsanyi, B.; Kennedy, J. P. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. 1977, 15, 3047-3074.
20. 2 ≈ 1, the reactivity of monomers A and B to itself and to the other monomer are equal, resulting in a statistical distribution of the monomers throughout the polymer chains.
21. 2 < 1, the reactivity of monomer A to itself is larger than to monomer B, and the reactivity of monomer B to itself is lower than to monomer A.; therefore, monomer A will be incorporated faster in the beginning of the polymerization, and during the polymerization more and more of monomer B will be incorporated due to its increasing concentration, as compared to the concentration of monomer A. As a result, the polymer chains will have a gradient in the monomer composition.
22. Kryszewski, K. Polym. Adv. Technol. 1998, 9, 244-259.
23. Matyjaszewski, K.; Xia, J. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2921-2990.
24. Gray, M. K.; Zhou, H.; Nguyen, S. T.; Torkelson, J. M. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 5586-5595.
25. Wijnans, S.; De Gans, B.-J.; Wiesbrock, F.; Hoogenboom, R.; Schubert, U. S.; Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1958-1962.