Discrete direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis for arbitrary Mach number flows

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 297-318

  Balasubramanian, R ^a   Newman, III ^b  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete sensitivity analysis; Flux limiters; Parallel

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW OF FLUIDS; LINEARIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARALLEL ALGORITHMS;

DISCRETE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; FLUX LIMITERS; MACH NUMBER FLOWS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW OF FLUIDS; LINEARIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARALLEL ALGORITHMS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33645473931     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1558     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Turkel E. Review of preconditioning methods for fluid dynamics. Applied Numerical Mathematics 1993; 12:257-284.
2. Briley WR, Taylor LK, Whitfield DL. High-resolution viscous flow simulations at arbitrary Mach number. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 184:79-105.
3. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA 92-0439, 1992.
4. Squire W, Trapp G. Using complex variables to estimate derivatives of real functions. SIAM Review 1998; 40(1):110-112.
5. Newman JC III, Whitfield DL, Anderson WK. Multidisciplinary sensitivity derivatives using complex variables. Technical Report MSSU-COE-ERC-98-08, Mississippi State University, July 1998.
6. Newman JC III, Whitfield DL, Anderson WK. A step-size independent approach for multidisciplinary sensitivity analysis. Journal of Aircraft 2003; 40(3):566-573.
7. Newman JC III, Taylor AC III, Barnwell RC, Newman PA, Hou GJ-W. Overview of sensitivity analysis and shape optimization for complex aerodynamic configurations. Journal of Aircraft 1999; 36(1):87-96.
8. Jameson A. Aerodynamic design via control theory. Journal of Scientific Computing 1988; 3:233-260.
9. Soemarwoto B. The variational method for aerodynamic optimization using the Navier-Stokes equations. Technical Report, ICASE, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, MS 132C, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681-0001. Report No. 97-71, December 1997.
10. Anderson WK, Venkatakrishnan V. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. AIAA 97-0643, 1997.
11. Nadarajah SK, Jameson A. A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization. AIAA 2000-0667, 2000.
12. Nadarajah SK, Jameson A. Studies of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to viscous automatic aerodynamic shape optimization, AIAA 2001-2530, 2001.
13. Giles MB. Adjoint methods for aeronautical design. Technical Report, ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 2001, September 2001.
14. Hou GJ-W, Taylor AC III, Korivi VM. Discrete shape sensitivity equations for aerodynamic problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1994; 37:2251-2266.
15. Nielsen EJ. Aerodynamic design sensitivities on an unstructured mesh using the Navier-Stokes equations and a discrete adjoint formulation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, December 1998.
16. Giles MB, Dutta MC, Müller JD. Adjoint code developments using the exact discrete approach. AIAA 2001-2596, 2001.
17. Nielsen EJ, Anderson WK. Recent improvements in aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes. AIAA Journal 2002; 40(6):1155-1163.
18. Nadarajah SK. Discrete adjoint formulation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, January 2003.
19. Giles MB, Dutta MC, Müller JD, Pierce NA. Algorithm developments for discrete adjoint methods. AIAA Journal 2003; 41(2):198-205.
20. Nielsen EJ, Lu J, Park MA, Darmofal DL. An implicit, exact dual adjoint solution method for turbulent flows on unstructured grids. Computers and Fluids 2004; 33:1131-1155.
21. Giles MB. On adjoint equations for error analysis and optimal grid adaptation in cfd. Technical Report 97/11, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Numerical Analysis Group, Oxford, England, September 1997.
22. Giles MB, Pierce NA. Improved lift and drag estimates using adjoint Euler equations. AIAA 1999-3293, 1999.
23. Giles MB, Pierce NA. Adjoint recovery of superconvergent functionals from pde approximations. SIAM Review 2000; 42(2):247-264.
24. Giles MB, Pierce NA. Adjoint error correction for integral outputs. Technical Report 01/18, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Numerical Analysis Group, Oxford, England, September 1997.
25. Müller JD, Giles MB. Solution adaptive mesh refinement using adjoint error analysis. AIAA 2001-2550, 2001.
26. Venditti DA, Darmofal DL. A multilevel error estimation and grid adaptive strategy for improving the accuracy of integral outputs. AIAA 99-3292, 1999.
27. Venditti DA, Darmofal DL. Grid adaptation for functional outputs of 2-D compressible flow simulations. AIAA 2000-2244, 2000.
28. Venditti DA, Darmofal DL. Adjoint error estimation and grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to quasi-one-dimensional flow. Journal Computational Physics 2000; 164:204-227.
29. Venditti DA, Darmofal DL. Grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional inviscid flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 176:40-69.
30. Venditti DA. Grid adaptation for functional outputs of compressible flow simulations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2002.
31. Venditti DA, Darmofal DL. Anisotropic grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional viscous flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 187:22-46.
32. Park MA. Adjoint-based, three-dimensional error prediction and grid adaptation. AIAA 2002-3286, 2002.
33. Balasubramanian R. Error estimation and grid adaptation for functional outputs using discrete adjoint sensitivity analysis. MS Thesis, Mississippi State University, December 2002.
34. Barth TJ, Jespersen D. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. AIAA 89-0366, 1989.
35. Venkatakrishnan V. On the accuracy of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions. AIAA 93-0880, 1993.
36. Whitfield DL. Lecture Notes on Computational Fluid Dynamics II, Spring Semester 2001. ASE 8423, Mississippi State University.
37. Hyams DG. An investigation of parallel implicit solution algorithms for incompressible flows on unstructured topologies. Ph.D. Dissertation, Mississippi State University, May 2000.
38. Sheng C, Newman JC III, Remotigue M, Chen JP, Marcum DL, Whitfield DL. Development of unstructured computational capabilities to MSU-TURBO with an arbitrary Mach algorithm. Report MSSU-COE-ERC-02-16, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 2002.
39. White FM. Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1974.
40. Spalart PR, Shur M. On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Science and Technology 1997; 297-302.
41. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 23:357-372.
42. Korivi VM, Taylor AC III, Newman PA, Hou GJ-W, Jones HE. An approximate factored incremental strategy for calculating consistent discrete cfd sensitivity derivatives. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 113: 336-346.
43. Hou GJ-W, Maroju V, Taylor AC III, Korivi VM, Newman PA. Transonic turbulent airfoil design optimization using automatic differentiation in incremental iterative form. AIAA 1995-1692, 1995.
44. Sherman LL, Taylor AC III, Green LL, Newman PA, Hou GJ-W, Korivi VM. First- and second-order aerodynamic sensitivity derivatives via automatic differentiation with incremental iterative methods. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 129:307-331.
45. Schmitt V, Charpin F. Pressure distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at transonic Mach numbers. Experimental data base for computer program assessment. Report of the Fluid Dynamics Panel Working Group 04, AGARD AR 138, May 1979. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/m6wing/ m6wing.html
46. Karypis G, Kumar V. A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1998; 20(1):359-392.
47. Karypis G, Kumar V. METIS: family of multilevel partitioning algorithms, 1998. http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/karypis/metis/index.html