Quantification of coronary artery stenosis with 16-slice MSCT in patients before CABG surgery: Comparison to standard invasive coronary angiography

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Probst, Chris ^a   Kovacs, A ^a   Schmitz, C ^a   Schiller, W ^a   Schild, H ^a   Welz, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33645473055     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20041144     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, et al. 2000. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multi-slice spiral CT. Circulation 102:2823-8.
2. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, et al. 2001. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standard. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2170-214.
3. Becker C, Knez A, Ohnesorge B, Schöpf U, Reiser M. 2000. Imaging of non-calcified coronary plaques using helical CT with retrospective ECG gating. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:423-4.
4. Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy MI, Takaro T 1975. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation 52:979-86.
5. Flohr T, Küttner A, Bruder H, et al. 2003. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT-system with 16-slice detector and increased gantry rotation speed for isotropic submillimeter imaging of the heart. Herz 28:7-19.
6. Heuschmid M, Kuttner A, Flohr T, et al. 2002. Darstellung der Herzkranzgefäße mittels eines neuen 16-Zeilen Computertomographen mit verbesserter Rotationsgescgwindigkeit: Erste klinische Erfahrungen. RöFo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174:721-4.
7. Hill MN. 1998. New targeted AHA program: cardiovascular care and outcomes. Circulation 97:1221-2.
8. Kopp A, Georg C, Schröder S, Küttner A, Claussen C, Ohnesorge B. 2000. Optimization of image reconstruction time point in the Rr-interval for visualization of the coronary arteries with multi-slice CT. Abstract book of the 86th scientific assembly and annual meeting of the RSNA. 217:234.
9. Kopp A, Schröder S, Küttner A, et al. 2001. Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. Radiology 221:683-8.
10. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. 2002. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral CT. Circulation 106:2051-4.
11. Pfeiler M. 2000. Development and current status of invasive coronary angiography. Z Kardiol 89:3-10.
12. Sones FM, Shirey EK, Proudfit WL, Westcott RN. 1959. Cine coronary arteriography. Circulation 20:773-5.
13. Windecker S, Maier-Rudolph W, Bonzel, et al. 1999. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1995. Eur Heart J 20:484-95.