Respondent behavior in discrete choice modeling with a focus on the valuation of travel time savings

Journal of Transportation and Statistics

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 17-30

  Hensher, David A ^a   Rose, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attribute relevance; Stated choice experiment; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645462957     PISSN: 10948848     EISSN: 10948848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arentze, T., A. Borgers, H. Timmermans, and R. DelMistro. 2003. Transport Stated Choice Responses: Effects of Task Complexity, Presentation Format and Literacy. Transportation Research E 39:229-244.
2. Bunch, D.S., J.J. Louviere, and D. Anderson. 1996. A Comparison of Experimental Design Strategies for Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis with Generic-Attribute Multinomial Logit Models, working paper. Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis.
3. Carlsson, F. and P. Martinsson. 2003. Design Techniques for Stated Preference Methods in Health Economics. Health Economics 12:281-294.
4. Cattin, P. and D.R. Wittink. 1982. Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey. Journal of Marketing 46(3):44-53.
5. Gilboa, I., D. Schmeidler, and P. Wakker. 2002. Utility in Case-Based Decision Theory. Journal of Economic Theory 105:483-502.
6. Green, P.E and V. Srinivasan. 1978. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5(2):103-123.
7. Green, P.E and V. Srinivasan. 1990. Conjoint Analysis in Marketing Research: New Developments and Directions. Journal of Marketing 54(4):3-19.
8. Greene, W.H., D.A. Hensher, and J. Rose. 2006. Accounting for Heterogeneity in the Variance of Unobserved Effects in Mixed Logit Models (NW Transport Study Data). Transportation Research B 40(1):75-92.
9. Hensher, D.A. 2001. Measurement of the Valuation of Travel Time Savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35(1):71-98.
10. Hensher, D.A. 2004. Accounting for Stated Choice Design Dimensionality in Willingness to Pay for Travel Time Savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 38(2):425-446.
11. Hensher, D.A. In press (a). How Do Respondents Handle Stated Choice Experiments? Attribute Processing Strategies Under Varying Information Load. Journal of Applied Econometrics.
12. Hensher, D.A. In press (b). The Signs of the Times: Imposing a Globally Signed Condition on Willingness to Pay Distributions. Transportation.
13. Hensher, D.A., J. Rose, and W.H. Greene. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Huber, J. and K. Zwerina. 1996. The Importance of Utility Balance and Efficient Choice Designs. Journal of Marketing Research 33(3):307-317.
15. Jou, R. 2001. Modelling the Impact of Pre-Trip Information on Commuter Departure Time and Route Choice. Transportation Research B 35(10):887-902.
16. Jovicic, G. and C.O. Hansen. 2003. A Passenger Travel Demand Model for Copenhagen. Transportation Research A 37(4):333-349.
17. Kahnemann, D. and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk. Econometrica 47(2):263-291.
18. Kanninen, B.J. 2002. Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice Experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 39:214-217. May.
19. Kuhfeld, W.F., R.D. Tobias, and M. Garratt. 1994. Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications. Journal of Marketing Research 21(4):545-557.
20. Lam, S.H. and F. Xie. 2002. Transit Path Models That Use RP and SP Data. Transportation Research Record 1799:58-65.
21. Lazari, A.G. and D.A. Anderson. 1994. Designs of Discrete Choice Experiments for Estimating Both Attribute and Availability Cross Effects. Journal of Marketing Research 31(3):375-383.
22. Louviere, J.J. and H.J.P. Timmermans. 1990. Hierarchical Information Integration Applied to Residential Choice Behaviour. Geographical Analysis 22:127-145.
23. Louviere, J.J., D.A. Hensher, and J.F. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods and Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. Frontiers of Econometrics. Edited by P. Zarembka. New York, NY: Academic Press.
25. McFadden, D. 2001. Economic Choices: Economic Decisions of Individuals, notes prepared for a lecture at the University of California, Berkeley. March 18.
26. Oppewal, H., J.J. Louviere, and H.J.P. Timmermans. 1994. Modeling Hierarchical Information Integration Processes with Integrated Conjoint Choice Experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 31(1):92-105.
27. Ortúzar, J. de Dios., A. Iacobelli, and C. Valeze. 2000. Estimating Demand for a Cycle-Way Network. Transportation Research A 34(5):353-373.
28. Revelt, D. and K. Train. 2000. Customer-Specific Taste Parameters and Mixed Logit, working paper. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. Available at http://elsa.berkeley.edu/wp/ train0999.pdf.
29. Richardson, A.J. 2002. Simulation Study of Estimation of Individual Specific Values of Time Using an Adaptive Stated Preference Survey paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
30. Rose, J.M. and M.C.J. Bliemer. 2004. The Design of Stated Choice Experiments: The State of Practice and Future Challenges, working paper. University of Sydney. April.
31. Rose, J.M. and D.A. Hensher. 2004. Handling Individual Specific Availability of Alternatives in Stated Choice Experiments, paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Travel Survey Methods, Los Sueños, Costa Rica.
32. Sandor, Z. and M. Wedel. 2001. Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior Beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research 38(4):430-444.
33. Siegel S. and N. Castellan. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
34. Starmer, C. 2000. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice Under Risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38:332-382.
35. Swait, J. and W. Adamowicz. 2001a. The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching. Journal of Consumer Research 28:135-148.
36. Swait, J. and W. Adamowicz. 2001b. Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49:1-27.
37. Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Toubia, R., J.R. Hauser, and D.I. Simester. 2004. Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice Based Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 41(1):116-131.
39. Wang, D., L. Jiuqun, and H.J.P. Timmermans. 2001. Reducing Respondent Burden, Information Processing and Incomprehensibility in Stated Preference Surveys: Principles and Properties of Paired Conjoint Analysis. Transportation Research Record 1768:71-78.
40. Wittink, D.R. and P. Cattin. 1989. Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update. Journal of Marketing 53(3):91-96.