The effects of celeration lines on visual data analysis

Behavior Modification

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 295-314

  Normand, Matthew P ^a,b,c   Bailey, Jon S ^a,d  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^d Florida Association for Behavior Analysis   (United States)

Author keywords

Board certified behavior analysts; Celeration lines; Protocol analysis; Visual data analysis; Within subject research

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CELERATION LINE; CERTIFICATION; COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PSYCHOANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISION;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; STATISTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645460039     PISSN: 01454455     EISSN: 15524167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0145445503262406     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Austin, J., & Mawhinney, T. C. (1999). Using concurrent verbal reports to examine data analyst verbal behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 18, 61-81.
2. Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167-172.
3. DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analysis of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 573-579.
4. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Fisch, G. S. (1998). Visual inspection of data revisited: Do the eyes still have it? Behavior Analyst, 21, 111-123.
6. Furlong, M. J., & Wampold, B. E. (1982). Intervention effects and relative variation as dimensions in experts' use of visual inference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 413-426.
7. Heard, K., & Watson, T. S. (1999). Reducing wandering by persons with dementia using differential reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 381-384.
8. Jones, R. R., Weinrott, M., & Vaught, R. S. (1978). Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 277-283.
9. LeCroy, C. W., & Tolman, R. M. (1991). Single-system design use of behavior therapists: Implications for social work. Journal of Social Service Research, 14, 45-55.
10. Matyas, T. A., & Greenwood, K. M. (1990). Visual analysis of single-case timer series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 341-351.
11. Matyas, T. A., & Greenwood, K. M. (1991). Problems in the estimation of autocorrelation in brief time series and some implications for behavioral data. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 137-157.
12. Michael, J. (1974). Statistical inferences for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647-653.
13. Ottenbacher, K. J. (1990). When is a picture worth a thousand p values?*A comparison of visual and quantitative methods to analyze single subject data. Journal of Special Education, 23, 436-449.
14. Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1978). The analysis and presentation of graphic data. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single-subject research: Strategies for evaluating change (pp. 101-165). New York: Academic Press.
15. Richards, S. B., Taylor, R. L., & Ramasamy, R. (1997). Effects of subject and rater characteristics on the accuracy of visual analysis of single subject data. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 355-362.
16. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.
17. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18. Stocks, J. T., & Williams, M. (1995). Evaluation of single subject data using statistical hypothesis tests versus visual inspection of charts with and without celeration lines. Journal of Social Service Research, 20, 105-126.