-
1
-
-
70350694125
-
Pelvic scoring for elective induction.
-
Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:266-8.
-
(1964)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.24
, pp. 266-8
-
-
Bishop, E.H.1
-
2
-
-
15944428221
-
Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
-
Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690-7.
-
(2005)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.105
, pp. 690-7
-
-
Vrouenraets, F.P.1
Roumen, F.J.2
Dehing, C.J.3
van den Akker, E.S.4
Aarts, M.J.5
Scheve, E.J.6
-
3
-
-
0032711380
-
A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term.
-
Abramovici D, Goldwasser S, Mabie BC, Mercer BM, Goldwasser R, Sibai BM. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1108-12.
-
(1999)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.181
, pp. 1108-12
-
-
Abramovici, D.1
Goldwasser, S.2
Mabie, B.C.3
Mercer, B.M.4
Goldwasser, R.5
Sibai, B.M.6
-
4
-
-
0036087936
-
Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques.
-
Barrilleaux PS, Bofill JA, Terrone DA, Magann EF, May WL, Morrison JC. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1124-9.
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.186
, pp. 1124-9
-
-
Barrilleaux, P.S.1
Bofill, J.A.2
Terrone, D.A.3
Magann, E.F.4
May, W.L.5
Morrison, J.C.6
-
5
-
-
0242425752
-
A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction.
-
Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP. A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1031-5.
-
(2003)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.189
, pp. 1031-5
-
-
Chung, J.H.1
Huang, W.H.2
Rumney, P.J.3
Garite, T.J.4
Nageotte, M.P.5
-
6
-
-
1942454432
-
A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
-
Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women. Am J Perinatol 2004;21:139-46.
-
(2004)
Am J Perinatol
, vol.21
, pp. 139-46
-
-
Culver, J.1
Strauss, R.A.2
Brody, S.3
Dorman, K.4
Timlin, S.5
McMahon, M.J.6
-
7
-
-
0028945457
-
Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter.
-
St. Onge RD, Connors GT. Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:687-90.
-
(1995)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.172
, pp. 687-90
-
-
St. Onge, R.D.1
Connors, G.T.2
-
8
-
-
0035082741
-
A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.
-
Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:603-7.
-
(2001)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.97
, pp. 603-7
-
-
Sciscione, A.C.1
Nguyen, L.2
Manley, J.3
Pollock, M.4
Maas, B.5
Colmorgen, G.6
-
9
-
-
0034081349
-
A randomized trial of misoprostol versus extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor.
-
Buccellato CA, Stika CS, Frederiksen MC. A randomized trial of misoprostol versus extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1039-44.
-
(2000)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.182
, pp. 1039-44
-
-
Buccellato, C.A.1
Stika, C.S.2
Frederiksen, M.C.3
-
10
-
-
0034116514
-
Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
-
Guinn DA, Goepfert AR, Christine M, Owen J, Hauth JC. Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:106-12.
-
(2000)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.96
, pp. 106-12
-
-
Guinn, D.A.1
Goepfert, A.R.2
Christine, M.3
Owen, J.4
Hauth, J.C.5
-
11
-
-
0029075986
-
A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus laminaria for cervical ripening.
-
Lin A, Kupferminc M, Dooley SL. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus laminaria for cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:545-9.
-
(1995)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.86
, pp. 545-9
-
-
Lin, A.1
Kupferminc, M.2
Dooley, S.L.3
-
12
-
-
0036794735
-
A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction.
-
Mullin PM, House M, Paul RH, Wing DA. A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:847-52.
-
(2002)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.187
, pp. 847-52
-
-
Mullin, P.M.1
House, M.2
Paul, R.H.3
Wing, D.A.4
-
13
-
-
0031981524
-
A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction.
-
Vengalil SR, Guinn DA, Olabi NF, Burd LI, Owen J. A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:774-9.
-
(1998)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.91
, pp. 774-9
-
-
Vengalil, S.R.1
Guinn, D.A.2
Olabi, N.F.3
Burd, L.I.4
Owen, J.5
-
14
-
-
2342480590
-
Increased rates of chorioamnionitis with extra-amniotic saline infusion method of labor induction.
-
Levey KA, MacKenzie AP, Stephenson C, Bercik R, Kuczynski E, Funai EF. Increased rates of chorioamnionitis with extra-amniotic saline infusion method of labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:724-8.
-
(2004)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.103
, pp. 724-8
-
-
Levey, K.A.1
MacKenzie, A.P.2
Stephenson, C.3
Bercik, R.4
Kuczynski, E.5
Funai, E.F.6
-
15
-
-
4043090738
-
Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
-
Guinn DA, Davies JK, Jones RO, Sullivan L, Wolf D. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:225-9.
-
(2004)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.191
, pp. 225-9
-
-
Guinn, D.A.1
Davies, J.K.2
Jones, R.O.3
Sullivan, L.4
Wolf, D.5
-
16
-
-
0037006675
-
Sample size slippages in randomized trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward.
-
Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Sample size slippages in randomized trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward. Lancet 2002;359:781-5.
-
(2002)
Lancet
, vol.359
, pp. 781-5
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Grimes, D.A.2
|