Epistemology of visual imaging in endoscopic surgery

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 20, Issue 2 SUPPL., 2006, Pages

  Cuschieri, A ^a  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ergonomics of imaging for endoscopic surgery; Image quality; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

COLOR VISION; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EPISTEMOLOGY; ERGONOMICS; EYE DOMINANCE; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING; MONOCULAR VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGEON; VISION;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY; VISION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33645449732     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-0020-9     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Ankrum DR (1996) Viewing distance at computer workstations. Workplace Ergonom 2: 10-13
2. Coday MP, Warren MA, Jahrling KV, Rubin PA (2002) Acquired monocular vision: functional consequences from patient's perspective. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 18: 56-63
3. Cuschieri A (1995) Visual displays and visual perception in minimal access surgery. Sem Lap Surg; 2: 209-214
4. Cuschieri A (1996) Visual display technology for endoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 5: 427-434
5. El Shalaly G, Cuschieri A (in press) Optimum view distance for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc
6. Gibson JJ (1954) The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement. Psychol Rev 61: 304-314
7. Grandjean E, Hunting W, Nishiyama K (1983). VDT workstation design: preferred settings and their effects. Hum Factors 25: 161-175
8. Gregory RL (1995) Visual perception: seeing backwards in time. Nature 373: 21-22
9. Hanna GB, Shimi SM. Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227: 481-484
10. Hedge A, Sims WR, Becker FD (1995) Effects of lense-indirect and parabolic lighting on the satisfaction, visual health, and productivity of office workers. Ergonomics 38: 260-280
11. Hering E (1964) Outlines of a theory of the light sense Harvard. University Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Hermann von Helmholtz. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Leopold Voss, Hamburg
13. Hill SG, Kroemer KHE (1986) Preferred declination of the line of sight. Hum Factors 28: 27-134
14. Hurvich LM, Jameson D (1957) An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psychol Rev 64: 384-404
15. Jaschinski W, Heuer H, Kylian H (1998) Preferred position of visual displays relative to eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. Ergonomics 41: 1034-1049
16. Jackson SR, Newport R, Shaw A (2002) Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements. Curr Biol 12: 1-20
17. Jaschinski-Kruza W (1988) Visual strain during VDU work: the effect of viewing distance and dark focus. Ergonomics 31: 1449-1465
18. Jaschinski-Kruza W (1990) On the preferred viewing distances to screen and document at VDU workplaces. Ergonomics 33: 1055-1063
19. Jaschinski-Kruza W (1991) Eyestrain in VDU users: viewing distance and the resting position of ocular muscles. Hum Factors 33: 69-83
20. Kennedy A, Baccino T (1995) The effects of screen refresh rate on editing operations using a computer mouse pointing device. Q J Exp Psychol A 48: 55-71
21. Kennedy A, Murray WS (1996) Eye movement control during the inspection of words under conditions of pulsating illumination. Eur J Cognitive Psychol 8: 381-403
22. Livingstone MS (2004) Was Rembrandt stereoblind? N Engl J Med 351: 1264-1265
23. Omar AM, Wade NJ, Brown SI, Cuschieri A (2005) Assessing the benefits of "gaze-down" display location in complex tasks. Surg Endosc 19: 105-108
24. Owens DA (1984) The resting state of the eyes. Am Scientist 72: 378-387
25. Owens DA, Wolf-Kelly K (1987) Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Investig Ophthalmol Visual Sci 28: 743-749
26. Paul RD (1997) Nurturing and pampering paradigm for office ergonomics. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 41st Annual Meeting, pp 519-523
27. Ripple P (1952) Variation of accommodation in vertical directions of gaze. Am J Ophthalmol 35: 1630-1634
28. Sevos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res 32: 1513-1521
29. Tyrrell R, Leibowitz H (1990) The relation of vergence effort to reports of visual fatigue following prolonged near work. Hum Factors 32: 341-357
30. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, Liu K, Lee CM, Whang K, Hunter JG (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237: 460-469
31. Wertheimer M (1953) On the supposed behavior correlates of eye content response on the Rorschach. J Consult Psychol 17: 189-194
32. Westheimer G (1999) Gestalt theory reconfigured: Max Wertheimer's anticipation of recent developments in visual neurpscience. Perception 28: 5-15