Subspace-based identification algorithms for Hammerstein and Wiener models

European Journal of Control

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 127-136

  Gómez, Juan C ^a   Baeyens, Enrique ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Hammerstein and Wiener Models; Nonlinear System Identification; Singular Value Decomposition; Subspace Methods

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESTIMATION; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); LINEAR SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS;

HAMMERSTEIN AND WIENER MODELS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; SUBSPACE METHODS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33645414091     PISSN: 09473580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3166/ejc.11.127-136     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bai E. An optimal two-stage identification algorithm for Hammerstein-Wiener nonlinear systems. Automatica 1998; 34(3): 333-338
2. Billings S. Identification of nonlinear systems - A survey. Proc IEE, Part D 1980; 127: 272-285
3. Billings S, Fakhouri S. Identification of a class of nonlinear systems using correlation analysis. Proc IEE, Corresp 1978; 125: 1307
4. Billings S, Fakhouri S. Identification of systems containing linear dynamic and static nonlinear elements. Automatica 1982; 18(1): 15-26
5. Boutayeb M, Darouach M. Recursive identification method for MISO Wiener-Hammerstein model. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1995; 40(2): 287-291
6. Boyd S, Chua L. Fading memory and the problem of approximating nonlinear operators with Volterra series. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 1985; CAS-32(11): 1150-1161
7. Chen H, Maciejowski J. An improved subspace identification method for bilinear systems. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE conference on decision and control CDC2000, Sydney, Australia, December 2000 pp 1573-1578
8. Chen H, Maciejowski J. Subspace identification method for combined deterministic-stochastic bilinear systems. In: Proceedings of the IFAC symposium on system identification SYSID 2000, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, June 2000
9. Eskinat E, Johnson S, Luyben W. Use of Hammerstein models in identification of nonlinear systems. AIChE J 1991; 37(2): 255-268
10. Favoreel W, de Moor B, Van Overschee P. Subspace identification of bilinear systems subject to white inputs. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1999; 44(6): 1157-1165
11. Fruzzetti K, Palazoglu A, McDonald K. Nonlinear model predictive control using Hammerstein models. J Process Control 1997; 7(1): 31-41
12. Garulli A, Giarrè L, Zappa G. Identification of approximated Hammerstein models in a worst-case setting. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2002; 47(12): 2046-2050
13. Golub G, Van Loan C. Matrix computations. 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1989
14. Gómez JC, Jutan A, Baeyens E. Wiener model identification and predictive control of a pH neutralization process. IEE Proc Control Theory Appl 2004; 151(3): 329-338
15. Greblicki W. Nonparametric identification of Wiener systems by orthogonal series. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1994; 39(10): 2077-2086
16. Henson M, Seborg D. Adaptive nonlinear control of a pH neutralization process. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 1994; 2(3): 169-182
17. Henson M, Seborg D. (eds) 'Feedback linearizing control.' Nonlinear Process Control, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997, chapter 4
18. Kalafatis A, Arifin N, Wang L, Cluett W. A new approach to the identification of pH processes based on the Wiener model. Chem Eng Sci 1995; 50(23): 3693-3701
19. Korenberg M. Identification of biological cascades of linear and static nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th midwest symposium on circuit theory, 1978, pp. 2.1-2.9
20. Larimore W. Canonical variate analysis in identification, filtering, and adaptive control. In: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Honolulu, Hawaii, December 1990. pp. 596-604
21. Larimore W. The optimality of canonical variate identification by example. In: Proceedings of 10th IFAC symposium on system identification SYSID'94, vol 2, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 1994, pp. 151-156
22. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1999
23. Ljung L. System Identification Toolbox, User's Guide, ver. 5. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, 2000
24. Narendra K, Gallman P. An iterative method for the identification of nonlinear systems using a Hammerstein model. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1966; AC-11: 546-550
25. Pearson R, Pottmann M. Gray-box identification of block-oriented nonlinear models. J Process Control 2000; 10: 301-315
26. Rangan S, Wolodkin G, Poolla K. New results for Hammerstein system identification. In: Proceedings of the 34th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, USA, December 1995, pp. 697-702
27. Stapleton J, Bass S. Adaptive noise cancellation for a class of nonlinear dynamic reference channels. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 1985; CAS-32: 143-150
28. Stoica P. On the convergence of an iterative algorithm used for Hammerstein system identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1981; AC-26(4): 967-969
29. Van Overschee P, de Moor B. N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems. Automatica 1994; 30(1): 75-93
30. Verhaegen M. Identification of the deterministic part of MIMO state space models given in innovations form from input-ouput data. Automatica 1994; 30(1): 61-74
31. Verhaegen M, Westwick D. Identifying MIMO Hammerstein systems in the context of subspace model identification methods. Int J Control 1996; 63(2): 331-349
32. Westwick D, Verhaegen M. Identifying MIMO Wiener systems using subspace model identification methods. Signal Process, 1996; 52: 235-258
33. Wigren T. Recursive prediction error identification using the nonlinear Wiener model. Automatica 1993; 29(4): 1011-1025
34. Wigren T. Convergence analysis of recursive identification algorithms based on the nonlinear Wiener model. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1994; 39(11): 2191-2206